Search for: "State v. W" Results 9181 - 9200 of 15,632
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jan 2013, 10:37 am by Michelle Yeary
  That’s precisely the scenario that prompted the case of Pfizer Inc. v. [read post]
29 Jan 2013, 10:28 am by Jeremy
Some accounts state that they have shelved the statute and the organisation (see W New). [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 4:59 pm by VALL Blog Master
Choice, v.50, no. 06, February 2013. [read post]
27 Jan 2013, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
Tessa Jowell complained to the PCC about an article in the Daily Mail which stated that Jowell had been criticised by the Cabinet Secretary in 2006 over an alleged payment to her husband by Silvio Berlusconi. [read post]
26 Jan 2013, 5:32 pm
Meier that the gift as stated in the will pursuant to his instructions would fail. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
The member states are furthermore in a position to balance conflicting rights and interests, such as the right of freedom of expression under Article 10 of the Convention with the right of property as protected by Article 1 of the First Protocol to the Convention. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 4:44 am by Susan Brenner
[W]hen JH opened her iTunes, she noticed another user's library -- `Dad's LimeWire Tunes’ -- was available for sharing. . . .U.S. v. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 6:44 am by Cormac Early
Perry (the challenge to California’s Proposition 8), and United States v. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 12:29 pm
The '564 Patent '564 Patent - meet your nemesis Claim 1 of the '564 patent entitled "Insecticidal combination effective against fleas on mammals, particularly cats and dogs" claimed the following A composition which provides small mammals with long-lasting protection against fleas, which includes, on the one hand, [fipronil] and, on the other hand, at least one ovicidal compound (B), of insect growth regulator (IGR) type, in a fluid vehicle which is acceptable to the mammal and suitable… [read post]