Search for: "A----. B v. C----. D"
Results 9201 - 9220
of 10,382
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Nov 2011, 10:59 pm
For anyone who worries that writers at this site are getting soft--and tolerant of dumb ways to maintain court systems--we will reach out and try here to be frank, forthright and clear: Popular election of state judges is beneath: (a) you, (b) your law firm, (c) your family's dog, and (d) especially your clients, and especially if you act for businesses who trade nationally or globally. [read post]
1 Mar 2009, 12:57 am
C. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 10:51 am
B. [read post]
5 Apr 2023, 5:01 am
[B.] [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 6:47 am
(v) For each nondramatic musical work embodied or intended to be embodied in phonorecords made under the compulsory license: (A) The title of the nondramatic musical work; (B) The name of the author or authors, if known; (C) A copyright owner of the work, if known… As I suspect based on the various lawsuits against Spotify over its apparent failures in the handling of these NOIs, the “if known” modifying “the name of the author or authors”… [read post]
13 Aug 2008, 8:42 am
Abraham and Anr. v. [read post]
11 Aug 2018, 3:12 am
The settlement of the case, Trowbridge et al v. [read post]
11 May 2010, 2:40 am
Speakers will include: • R Jovita Baber, University of Illinois, “Multiplicity of Meanings: Legal Pluralism and the Layer Legality of Land in Sixteenth-century Andes” • Louis Berkvens, Maastricht University, “An Approach of comparative history of legislation” • Juan B. [read post]
16 May 2008, 11:28 am
There seem to be six types of NN: a - Content Neutrality b - Application Neutrality c - Sender Neutrality d - Toll Free e - Sustain Separation of the Layers of the Internet f - Truth in Advertising The argument then is allow discrimination vs curbing discrimination. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 7:09 am
When assessing whether to recognize this legal theory, Minnesota’s high court pointed out that whenever it has the responsibility for evaluating a new common law tort, it assesses four factors: a) whether the tort is inherent in, or the natural extension of, a well-established common law right; b) whether the tort has been recognized in other states; c) whether recognizing the tort will create tension with other applicable laws; and d) whether such tension is… [read post]
20 Dec 2014, 8:25 am
On appeal in Bock v. [read post]
6 Sep 2023, 6:00 am
Employer business changes hands In the matter of Manthadi v ASCO Manufacturing, the employee, who was 69-years-old at the time of the hearing, started working for her previous employer (referred to as “637”) in 1981. [read post]
9 May 2023, 9:00 am
Tryckt i Køpe[n]haffn anno D[omi]ni Mccccc oc v … hoos Gotfrid aff Geme[n] oc nu igien prentet vdi Kiøbenhaffn : Aff Matz Wingaardt, 1576. [read post]
18 Nov 2008, 6:57 pm
Our Supreme Court, in Potter v. [read post]
30 Jul 2011, 8:44 am
Clemens' lawyers argue the case fits squarely within the Supreme Court's decision in Oregon v. [read post]
4 May 2022, 6:43 am
Profiling activities will require a data protection assessment when it would present a reasonably foreseeable risk of (A) unfair or deceptive treatment of, or unlawful disparate impact on, consumers, (B) financial, physical or reputational injury to consumers, (C) a physical or other intrusion upon the solitude or seclusion, or the private affairs or concerns, of consumers, where such intrusion would be offensive to a reasonable person, or (D) other substantial injury to… [read post]
22 Jul 2009, 9:37 am
Expert Testimony 12 O.S. 2702, 2703 The legislation essentially incorporates Federal Rule 702 and 703 which adds language from Daubert v. [read post]
1 Apr 2020, 10:06 am
The labels refers to: (A) justices’ bench, (B) clerk’s seats, (C) marshal’s seats, (D) arguing counsel tables, (E) press section, (F) justices’ box, (G) bar section and (H) public gallery. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 11:00 am
[4] Moodie R, Stuckler D, Montiero C, Sheron N, Neal B, Thamarangsi T, et al. [read post]
23 May 2017, 4:00 am
La exposición de motivos de la Ley 2 establece tres objetivos: a) satisfacer las necesidades de salud de la población; b) reducir los costos de los servicios y c) asegurar la disponibilidad de servicios en áreas donde estos escasean. [read post]
