Search for: "Defendants A-F"
Results 9201 - 9220
of 29,832
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Sep 2015, 2:01 am
Davis, 989 F.2d 244, 246 (7th Cir. 1993) (holding that defendant could not be convicted of bank fraud where the defendant deposited into an withdrew a fraudulently obtained, but actual IRS refund check from a bank); and United States v. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 1:10 pm
Burke, 904 F.2d at 183. [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 12:19 pm
Courts of Appeals for the 4th, 5th, 6th, 7th, 10th and 11th Circuits, or whether it should be placed on the defendant, as held by the U.S. [read post]
3 Aug 2021, 2:48 am
This decision is a positive development for those defending data security breach claims as it means that it will no longer be possible to contend that ATE premiums are recoverable from unsuccessful defendants in such cases. [read post]
20 Nov 2009, 4:24 pm
" Bulacan, 156 F.3d at 968 (citing Horton v. [read post]
3 Nov 2017, 6:34 am
“[I]f his actions are unconstitutional then the Database Act, which permitted him to do so, is also unconstitutional,” the appeals court explained. [read post]
30 Mar 2017, 11:41 am
General Dynamics C4 Systems, Inc., 637 F.3d 1047 (9th Cir. 2011). [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 3:01 am
Zuk, ___ F.3d ___ (4th Cir., Oct. 24, 2017). [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 12:09 pm
Peoni, 100 F.2d 401, 402 (2d Cir. 1938). [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 12:09 pm
Peoni, 100 F.2d 401, 402 (2d Cir. 1938). [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 12:09 pm
Peoni, 100 F.2d 401, 402 (2d Cir. 1938). [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 5:36 pm
A sentencing date for the defendant has not been set yet. [read post]
3 Jul 2008, 2:36 pm
Impastato, 543 F. [read post]
24 Sep 2015, 2:35 pm
Ivax Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 501 F.3d 1263 (Fed. [read post]
23 May 2011, 4:30 am
— Discontinue use if excessive irritation o[f] the skin develops. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 1:03 pm
Kearney billing at $373.50 per hour and Paul F. [read post]
11 Jun 2007, 5:10 am
This case arose from the defendant banks’ involvement in the accounting frauds committed by Enron. [read post]
2 Apr 2010, 10:40 am
This case was before the Court, following Defendant’s default. [read post]
16 May 2011, 9:23 am
" In stark contrast, Gregory F. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 8:04 pm
Sotomayor expressly contemplated this: [I]f the Government wants to ensure ex ante that a particular defendant’s term of imprisonment will not be reduced later, the solution is simple enough: Nothing prevents the Government from negotiating with a defendant to secure a waiver of his statutory right to seek sentence reduction under § 3582(c)(2), just as it often does with respect to a defendant’s rights to appeal and collaterally attack the… [read post]
