Search for: "License Cases"
Results 9201 - 9220
of 70,782
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Sep 2022, 12:35 pm
Let us bring our expertise to your case. [read post]
29 Aug 2014, 7:30 am
Titled "Trademark Licensing: The Once and Future Narrative", it appears in volume.104, issue 4 of that venerable publication and its abstract reads as follows:"This article sets out the narrative of trademark licensing on the basis of the following: (i) the ever-evolving nature of licensing in response to changing uses of marks in commerce; (ii) challenges to the legal validity of licensing under classic trademark doctrine; (iii) the role of… [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 12:53 pm
That’s because many TV renewal applications from the last renewal cycle still haven’t been granted, in many (if not most) cases thanks presumably to the dreaded “enforcement holds” arising from pending complaints lodged against the station. [read post]
6 Mar 2016, 5:30 am
In Alabama, state probate judges issue marriage licenses. [read post]
2 Sep 2021, 10:13 am
Anyway, licensing from the North American Fur Industry Communications group is “simply a matter of taking a training course on conservation and trapping systems, and then purchasing the license. [read post]
20 Apr 2022, 4:34 am
Texas), I've found out from the Munich I Regional Court today that a patent licensing firm named MiiCS is suing Ford there (case no. 7 O 14689/21; Presiding Judge: Dr. [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 6:10 am
At the time this compulsory license was enacted, one company had the monopoly on the piano roll market, and the Task Force has not seen evidence that a similar monopoly exists today for remixes or their licensing.Also, such compulsory licenses would allow the creation of derivative works, whereas statutory licenses now only permit reproducing, distributing, and public performance of the licensed work, without alteration (p. 26). [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 4:44 am
Assuming for the sake of the argument that Microsoft is right and Samsung wants to get out of the existing license agreement, this certainly wouldn't be the case if Microsoft had proven against Motorola (and Barnes & Noble, though not much happened there before a strategic partnership also put the patent dispute to rest) that Android does indeed infringe on valid Microsoft patent claims to a huge extent. [read post]
23 Jun 2013, 6:14 pm
If that is the case, then the Apple deal may actually represent a discount off of the statutory rate for the bundle of rights that they have acquired. [read post]
21 Oct 2012, 3:05 pm
The defendant took the gamble of going to court and the plaintiff’s case was victorious. [read post]
15 May 2009, 9:51 am
Of course, if that is the case then there can be no license suspension for refusing or failing the breathalzyer test and a conviction will be more difficult to sustain. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 9:24 am
Certainly, the sheer number of letters sent, and the brazenness of the campaign make this case somewhat of an outlier among patent troll licensing campaigns. [read post]
21 May 2008, 12:50 pm
Every skilled nursing facility (nursing home) in California is licensed by the California Department of Public Health (DPH). [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 4:30 pm
Jones took himself off of the case earlier that day. [read post]
23 Aug 2017, 7:19 am
The Court of Appeals recently held that these licensed psychologists can be disciplined by their licensing board if their performance of the evaluation negatively affects clients, or even attorneys involved in a case. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 10:14 am
They're definitely underwhelmed by Google's derivation from disparate license agreements (as was Judge Robart in the Microsoft-Motorola case). [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 4:00 am
In this case, there was at least one instance where plaintiff had allowed use of his photo for free, and he also made it available for free subject to a Creative Commons license, requiring attribution in return. [read post]
29 Jan 2016, 12:09 pm
The Ninth Circuit’s recent decision in the case of Dolby Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
1 May 2018, 9:01 pm
Slater and his publisher did not initially offer to pay Naruto a royalty for the use of the photographs, so PETA sued on Naruto’s behalf, arguing that under the Copyright Act he is their owner and thus entitled to a licensing fee. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 4:16 am
The post Is There a Difference Between Car and Truck Accident Cases? [read post]
