Search for: "MATTER OF RULES OF EVIDENCE" Results 9201 - 9220 of 42,247
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jun 2020, 1:12 am by Michael Douglas
Relevantly, clause 23 included the following: ‘23.1  A party must not commence court proceedings in respect of a dispute arising out of this agreement (“Dispute”), including without limitation a dispute regarding any breach or purported breach of this agreement, interpretation of any of its provisions, any matters concerning of parties’ performance or observance of its obligations under this agreement, or the termination or the right of a party to terminate this… [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 2:18 pm by Kevin LaCroix
 Federal Rule of Evidence 502 defines work-product protection as “the protection that applicable law provides for tangible material (or its intangible equivalent) prepared in anticipation of litigation or for trial. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 8:12 am by Christopher Hoffmann
The rules on determining liability through an independent medical examination depend from state to state. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 6:57 am by Lisa Larrimore Ouellette
The search for primary significance typically includes survey evidence in ex post genericness cases. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 5:14 am by Richard Altieri, Margaret Taylor
Trump (@realDonaldTrump) June 11, 2020 Trump’s tweet may have been a reference to Seattle’s decision to close a police precinct—but there has not been evidence of significant disorder in the city. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 6:18 pm by Ian Richardson
  A lawyer can attempt to enforce the rules of evidence. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 12:32 pm by Brandon Harter
The judge is in the courtroom to rule on objections and control the proceedings, but the jurors make the ultimate decision. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 6:26 am by Ansara Law Personal Injury Attorneys
And chances are, you probably don’t know how to prove it all or establish that the defense’s evidence is suspect. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 3:02 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
This appeal will consider, inter alia, whether the Judge had made a finding that torture had not been proved on the balance of probabilities as well as the correct treatment of hearsay evidence in a civil trial where the possibility of torture cannot be ruled out. [read post]
14 Jun 2020, 10:27 am by Fred Rocafort
This blog has been warning that this is How NOT to Handle Your China Legal Matters since 2006. [read post]
14 Jun 2020, 6:31 am by Russell Knight
Each county has its own court system for resolving divorce and other family law matters. [read post]
13 Jun 2020, 12:50 pm by Larry
What I disagree with is that the location of the coding matters. [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 4:37 pm by Earl Drott
Thus, the court ruled that summary judgment had been erroneous and remanded the case for further proceedings in the trial court. [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 4:14 pm by Benjamin Wittes
The judge has no jurisdiction over the matter, as there is no case or controversy before him. [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 2:01 pm
In that reconstitution, IOs should be equipped with internal and operational rules suitable for managing and early warning functions and with a coherent power to direct and coordinate the actions of the States that are part of it. [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins, Esq.
The employer Defendant asserted that these claims of independent negligence on the part of the employer should be dismissed because these claims offer no avenue for additional liability to the Plaintiff as the employer Defendant has admitted to an agency relationship will have them held liability if the driver is found to be negligent.This state court judge noted that, although the federal courts have accepted such arguments by Defendant employers in this context and have dismissed negligent hiring… [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Now, “Black lives matter” is painted in bright yellow letters on the road to the White House. [read post]
11 Jun 2020, 11:30 pm by Schachtman
More important, however, the invocation of Milward suggests that any alleged flaws in combining study results in a meta-analysis are always matters for the jury, no matter how arcane, technical, or threatening to validity they may be. [read post]