Search for: "Marks v. State " Results 9201 - 9220 of 21,692
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Apr 2016, 11:31 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
” (internal quotation marks, brackets, andcitations omitted)); Mars Inc. v. [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 10:22 am by John Elwood
State-on-top habeas case Woods v. [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 8:06 am by Beth Graham
Disputing would like to thank Mark Kantor for alerting us to the Department of Education’s proposed mandatory arbitration-related regulation. [read post]
31 Mar 2016, 10:45 am
With everyone feeling suitably optimistic about the future of copyright and trade mark law, are patent lawyers feeling equally jolly? [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 11:34 am by Andrew Hamm
United States and United States Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 10:20 am
The consensus view is that obligations to transfer the ownership of a trade mark do not fall within the scope of the exclusive jurisdiction of Article 22(4) Brussels I (see also Case 288/82 - Duijnstee v Goderbauer). [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 7:51 am by Tom B
This marked the first time that I really felt accepted by game developers and real part of our industry. [read post]
29 Mar 2016, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
” Like Mr Justice Mann, the judge was live to the marked difference between damages and costs:- “[12]. [read post]
29 Mar 2016, 9:46 am by Martin Bader and Ericka Schulz
  The Court relied on the plain reading of “during” to find that § 315(e) actually prohibits future estoppel on grounds for which an IPR was sought, but rejected—even if merely based on redundancy Shaw Industries Group, Inc. v. [read post]
 To determine strength, courts place the mark on the spectrum of trademark distinctiveness most prominently discussed in Abercrombie & Fitch Co. v. [read post]
29 Mar 2016, 12:51 am by Amy Howe
Gillie and the prisoner exhaustion case Ross v. [read post]
28 Mar 2016, 12:05 pm
The State Bar of California may not yet be aware of Mitts’s behavior. [read post]