Search for: "People v. Grant"
Results 9201 - 9220
of 16,997
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Sep 2014, 2:45 pm
The court concludes that the signed and sworn supporting affidavit of the burglary victim constituted reliable hearsay and/or a relevant statement of any victim under Correction Law § 168-n [3], and that the court was entitled to consider and rely on such evidence as clear and convincing proof that defendant is a level three risk as ruled in People v Saleemi, People v Victor, People v Jimenez and People v Salaam. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 10:31 am
(a)) in not granting leave to amend. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 9:21 am
Two people were killed in the head-on crash. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 12:11 am
More recently it was necessary for the parties to apply in good time (28 days) for a defamation case to be held with a jury under Part 26.11 of the Civil Procedure Rules (shown here as amended) but that application would be granted. [read post]
2 Sep 2014, 2:09 pm
Footnote 5 of Smith v. [read post]
2 Sep 2014, 1:36 pm
It takes real guts -- or stupidity -- to be a huge scammer and yet to file an appeal claiming that the FTC isn't allowed to make sure you don't scam additional people in the future. [read post]
2 Sep 2014, 11:30 am
The case is Hutchens v. [read post]
1 Sep 2014, 5:33 am
The wake was public knowledge and there were many people there, including all of his family. [read post]
31 Aug 2014, 12:49 pm
In dissent in Petrella v. [read post]
30 Aug 2014, 2:40 pm
It was ruled in People v Kearns, People v Hernandez, People v Cash, People v Sumpter, People v Salaam, Matter of Vandover v Czaika and Matter of New York Satae Bd. [read post]
29 Aug 2014, 2:51 pm
A Virginia law firm learned this lesson recently in Westlake Legal Group v. [read post]
29 Aug 2014, 8:53 am
That's Spokeo v. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 9:15 am
The California Supreme Court should grant review and make a final decision as to which position should prevail. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 1:01 am
” (Ellsberg v. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 11:39 am
In Toyukak v. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 9:10 am
In Panteleris v Panteleris, 2014 WL 3053211 (N.D.Ohio) the district court granted the petition of Anthimos Panteleris for return of the children of Anthimos and Aalison Panteleris to Australia. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 4:40 am
Paul (1992); (2) Snyder v. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 12:51 pm
(See also Miller v. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 12:50 pm
In Rodriguez v. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 9:35 am
Pritchard v. [read post]
