Search for: "State v. Chance" Results 9201 - 9220 of 12,121
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Feb 2011, 1:26 pm by Christa Culver
CaldwellDocket: 10-622Issue(s): (1) Whether a binding agreement among multiple states and private companies is immunized from antitrust scrutiny under the state-action immunity doctrine of Parker v. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 11:50 am by Brian A. Comer
I have been hearing for awhile that there is a chance that the South Carolina State Legislature may take action in response to the South Carolina Supreme Court's decision in Branham v. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 7:37 am
In June 2010, the First Circuit of the State of Louisiana Court of Appeal reversed and remanded the case of Lena Hebert et al. v. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 3:46 am by Russ Bensing
  On Wednesday, I discussed the possibility of the Supreme Court accepting jurisdiction in State v. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 3:02 pm by chief
There may be further additions and comments as people get a chance/have a brainwave. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 3:02 pm by chief
There may be further additions and comments as people get a chance/have a brainwave. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 3:49 am by Russ Bensing
  The subtext of the oral argument in US v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 5:29 pm by Anders Walker
  After rejecting Faulkner, he notes that civil rights lawyers like Thurgood Marshall had "turned the Supreme Court into the forum of liberty it was intended to be, and the Constitution of the United States into a briarpatch in which the nimble people, the willing people, have a chance. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 12:42 pm by JB
No chance they’ll be held up on appeal. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 9:52 am by John Elwood
United States (10-5296) and Vazquez v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 6:07 am by Bexis
  It's basically the same point we made over two years ago with our own state-by-state list, here. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 6:04 am by Rich Vetstein
T-Mobile Seeks To Bridge Coverage Gap The most recent victory by the wireless industry is T-Mobile Northeast LLC v. [read post]