Search for: "State v. Mark" Results 9201 - 9220 of 19,265
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jul 2012, 8:47 pm by Lawrence Solum
In this Article written for the Stanford symposium on the Adult Entertainment industry, I extend my consideration of the law’s treatment of sex after Lawrence v. [read post]
10 Sep 2018, 6:25 am by petrocohen
(PCPM) has been included in the 2019 edition of The Best Lawyers in America, marking his twenty fifth consecutive year to be recognized on the prestigious list. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Corp. v Kassis, 182 AD2d 22, 27 [1st Dept 1992] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted], lv dismissed and denied 80 NY2d 1005 [1992]; see Foley v Roche, 68 AD2d 558, 567-568 [1st Dept 1979]). [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Corp. v Kassis, 182 AD2d 22, 27 [1st Dept 1992] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted], lv dismissed and denied 80 NY2d 1005 [1992]; see Foley v Roche, 68 AD2d 558, 567-568 [1st Dept 1979]). [read post]
26 May 2015, 2:00 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The complaint fails to state that the child sustained so much as a bruise, redness or swelling. [read post]
28 Nov 2008, 12:14 pm
: Peer International Corporation, Southern Music Publishing Co and Peermusic (UK) Ltd v Editoria Musical de Cuba (IP finance) Justice Kitchin upholds British Beer and Pub Association and British Hospitality Association appeal against decision of Copyright Tribunal on basis for calculation of fees which members have to pay for background music (IPKat) Contempt of court: the risks of false testimony in trade mark infringement proceedings: KJM Superbikes Ltd v Hinton (IPKat)… [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 3:30 pm by Jason Rantanen
Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 558 (2007) (citations and internal quotation marks omitted). [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 6:41 pm
A copy of the complaint with exhibits can be downloaded here.In February 2005, WYD engaged F&R’s legal services (most likely in connection with a trademark infringement lawsuit filed by Who's Ya Daddy, Inc., the owner of the identical mark for clothing, against WYD in 2005 -- Who's Ya Daddy, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Oct 2018, 7:43 pm by Schachtman
Fisher noted that Lanier had been branded as deceptive by the second highest court in the United States, the United States Court of Appeals, in Christopher v. [read post]
31 May 2007, 12:47 pm
State of Karnataka stated that never has he seen castes fighting for backwardness (in the case of ligayats and vookaligas) and this marked the state of our nation. [read post]