Search for: "In INTEREST OF FEW v. State" Results 9221 - 9240 of 11,605
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Oct 2009, 9:47 pm
Under title 15 of the United States Code, it is unlawful for a person to engage in short selling that is “in contravention of such rules and regulations as the Commission may prescribe as necessary or appropriate in the public interest or for the protection of investors. [read post]
14 Dec 2007, 6:37 pm
Here, Andyarujina recalls a quarter-century old precedent for this episode: in Sudipt Mazumdar v. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 11:57 am
  Before moving on to the second part of its analysis the court distinguishes this case from other recent federal cases[8] by stating that none of those cases had addressed the issue at hand - a claim brought under 42 U.S.C. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 11:57 am
  Before moving on to the second part of its analysis the court distinguishes this case from other recent federal cases[8] by stating that none of those cases had addressed the issue at hand - a claim brought under 42 U.S.C. [read post]
17 Feb 2022, 9:45 am by Neil H. Buchanan
  For example, an interesting piece in The New York Times a few weeks ago describes the isolation of at-home learning, which is genuinely not anyone's first choice. [read post]
28 Sep 2012, 12:04 am
State of Haryana and another [(2003) 4 SCC 675], Nikhil Merchant v. [read post]
17 Jan 2010, 11:49 pm by Pamela Pengelley
” Yet, in law, as in life, few things are certain. [read post]
15 Jul 2008, 4:23 pm
” On the other side of the balance, the judge noted the government’s interest in detaining those who “actually pose an immediate threat to the national security of the United States during ongoing international conflict” and ensuring [read post]
31 Aug 2022, 10:21 pm by Bennett Cyphers
Public records indicate that some devices average several hundred pings per day in the dataset, while others are seen just a few times a day. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 11:52 am
  Abigail Alliance for Better Access to Developmental Drugs v. von Eschenbach, 495 F.3d 695, 710-11 (D.C. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 12:54 pm by Roy Ginsburg
Especially in a state that limits enforceability of vertical agreements (that is, of post-employment covenants with the employee), employers might look to other means to protect their interests. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 12:10 am by Steve Lombardi
Nevertheless, convenience stores in particular locations can be vulnerable to repeat victimization, especially those types of retailers that have large amounts of cash, low security, and few staff and customers likely to resist.5 Wertz' case is Brown v. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 4:09 am by Kevin LaCroix
Few candidates met all of these criteria, so Brennan found himself on the Supreme Court at age 50, with only seven years of state trial and appellate court judicial experience. [read post]