Search for: "In re A. V." Results 9221 - 9240 of 62,945
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jun 2011, 3:59 pm by Joe Wallin
You can find the final rules here: Final Rule Also see: SEC Press Release From the Final Rule: In summary, the rule defines a venture capital fund as a private fund that: (i) holds no more than 20 percent of the fund‘s capital commitments in non-qualifying investments (other than short-term holdings) (qualifying investments generally consist of equity securities of qualifying portfolio companies that are directly acquired by the fund, which we discuss below); (ii) does not borrow or otherwise… [read post]
11 Dec 2008, 12:02 am
The federal judge coordinating  the cases of some 200 Guantanamo Bay detainees challenging their long-term confinement gave hints on Wednesday that he may re-shape somewhat how those cases are to be handled by more than a dozen other federal judges. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 9:22 am by Venkat Balasubramani
(See “Disclosing Unique User IDs In URLs Doesn’t Violate ECPA–In re Zynga/Facebook“.) [read post]
12 May 2014, 1:38 pm by INFORRM
The European Court of Justice is due to hand down its long awaited judgment in Google v Spain (Case No C-131/12)  at 9.30am on 13 May 2014  In this post, Professor Lorna Woods sets out the background to the decision. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 6:51 am by tracey
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Faith Stewart v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2011] EWCA Civ 907 (29 July 2011) Suckrajh, R (on the application of) v The Asylum & Immigration Tribunal & Anor [2011] EWCA Civ 938 (29 July 2011) Iqbal v Ahmed [2011] EWCA Civ 900 (29 July 2011) Hayes v Merseyside Police [2011] EWCA Civ 911 (29 July 2011) Austin & Ors v Miller Argent (South Wales) Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 928 (29 July 2011) Modi & Anor… [read post]
1 Feb 2021, 4:46 am by Peter Mahler
Three weeks ago, I wrote about the Bak v Rostek case in Brooklyn Supreme Court addressing the duty to disclose third-party offers amidst buy-out negotiations between co-owners. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 2:37 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
  Here, in GSO RE Onshore LLC v Sapir ;2010 NY Slip Op 52138(U) ;Decided on November 24, 2010 ;Supreme Court, New York County ; Fried, J. [read post]
8 Jun 2014, 7:53 pm by Schachtman
The law is clear that scientific certainty is not required to prove causation to the legal standard of proof on a balance of probabilities (See: Snell v. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 10:08 pm
On September 28th the Second District Court of Appeal affirmed the trial court's denial of class certification in Cohen v. [read post]
15 Dec 2021, 4:11 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Casey, P.A. v Hochman, 963 F2d 1347 [10th Cir 1992]; In re Witko, 374 F3d 1040 [11th Cir 2004]). [read post]
28 Aug 2007, 7:34 am
Franklin, 415 F.3d 537 (6th Cir. 2005), but remanded for re-sentencing under United States v. [read post]
15 Apr 2008, 7:36 am
Lackey was assigned to a case called Jones et al v. [read post]