Search for: "Best v. Best"
Results 9241 - 9260
of 37,450
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Oct 2009, 6:10 am
And I worry that we are devoting too many of our very best minds to this enterprise. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 1:33 am
The Lord Chief Justice drew attention to Lord Diplock’s comments in Wright v British Railways Board [1983] 2 AC 773 that the Court of Appeal is “generally speaking the tribunal best qualified to set guidelines for judges trying such actions” particularly given the “inescapably artificial and conventional nature of the assessment of damages for non-economic loss”. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 1:30 am
Although the “folk belief” is that trial by jury is less favourable to the defendant, a number of the recent applications for trials by judge alone (Gregson, Charman v Orion 17 June 2005; Prince Radu of Hohenzollern v Houston [2007] EWHC 2328 (QB), Gentoo v Hanratty ([2008] EWHC 2328 (QB)) have been made by claimants. [read post]
28 Feb 2013, 8:13 am
To best understand this decision, we need to look at the rules concerning both class actions and securities: According to Rule 23(b)(3), a class action may be maintained if the court finds that questions of law or fact common to class members “predominate” over questions affecting individual members. [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 2:27 pm
In concludingthat Reed did not teach this limitation, the Boardrejected the portions of Ericsson’s Reply that argued thatto a person of ordinary skill, given that interleavingpackets together was known in the art, “[t]he differencebetween interleaving R-blocks together and interleavingS-blocks together is insubstantial at best,” holding thatthis was a new theory beyond the scope of a proper replyas defined in 37 C.F.R. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 1:36 pm
The case is called Wilson v. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 9:27 am
In Lasley v. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 5:22 am
Because most of these legal judgments make the debtor quite unsympathetic, however, we rarely see a case like Bullock v. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 6:04 pm
One of my favorite cases to attack expulsion hearings for an utter lack of proper evidence is John A. v. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 1:24 pm
Today the Second Department issued an interesting decision in the case Fox v. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 9:48 am
State v. [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 2:00 pm
Rich Ford: Tell us about Brown v. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 10:13 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
5 Feb 2009, 5:48 am
On Tuesday, February 3, the New Jersey Supreme Court heard arguments on the Family Law case of Fawzy v. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 7:55 am
Division of Youth and Family Services v. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 3:11 pm
As widely expected, Viacom has appealed the June 2010 district court ruling in Viacom v. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 11:06 am
As a result, the Special Prosecutor has concluded that it is in the best interest of the Navajo Nation to dismiss all claims for breach of fiduciary duty with prejudice against Leonard Tsosie and Lorenzo Bates. [read post]
24 May 2011, 3:13 am
The Supreme Court, in Brown v. [read post]
27 Jul 2009, 8:48 am
So Martin v. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 1:28 pm
I’m not convinced Daubert (read United States v. [read post]
