Search for: "CONVERSE v CONVERSE" Results 9241 - 9260 of 15,441
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Aug 2013, 7:15 am by Joy Waltemath
The employee’s intrusion into seclusion claim failed as a matter of law because the conduct of which she complained (being called at home by a manager) did not constitute a physical intrusion or eavesdropping on her conversation with the aid of wiretaps, microphones or spying. [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 8:21 am by Joy Waltemath
” The employer contended that the notes indicated only that she communicated with counsel regarding the employee’s termination and the outcome, in her words, of those communications; thus, there was no basis for treating the notes as a transcript of the actual conversation. [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
App developers “Bang-ed” up over trade mark dispute http://t.co/J2g6RKiz28 -> Another Keyword Advertising Lawsuit Fails–Allied Interstate v. [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 2:52 am
The copyright-related divertissement this summer was the joint IPKat/1709 Blog poll that followed the decision of the US 9th Circuit in Seltzer v Green Day (here and here) and sought readers' opinion on the following issue: Do you think that US fair use really makes a difference in terms of user freedoms? [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 3:52 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Based on People v Elufe, People v Fiumefreddo and People v Harris, to effectuate a valid guilty plea the defendant must enter the plea knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently. [read post]
17 Aug 2013, 8:00 am by Raffaela Wakeman
Steve didn‘t see how Ben could agree with both simultaneously, and Carrie wrote a short piece to close out the conversation for now. [read post]