Search for: "Chief Justice of the United States"
Results 9241 - 9260
of 14,935
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Dec 2013, 6:10 am
* An NSA review panel thinks the Chief Justice of the United States shouldn’t be the only one appointing judges to the FISA Court. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 1:15 pm
The United States Government must protect, at once, two different forms of security: national security and personal privacy. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 12:46 pm
” In 2000, the Supreme Court of the United States in its decision in Troxel v. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 11:00 am
The Post tells us that a former Russian soldier who fought against U.S. forces in Afghanistan may be tried by a military commission in the United States. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 1:02 am
On Appeal to the United States Supreme Court, Steele v. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 11:04 am
Today the Judiciary Committee of the United States Senate held a hearing on the Leahy-Lee patent reform proposal, "Protecting Small Businesses and Promoting Innovation by Limiting Patent Troll Abuse". [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 8:30 am
Named for the late Chief Justice of the United States, the Warren E. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 11:43 am
At argument, the Chief Justice was perhaps the only member of the Court who clearly signaled a strong view on the case, and he appeared to favor Heimeshoff. [read post]
15 Dec 2013, 6:24 pm
” United States v. [read post]
15 Dec 2013, 5:23 pm
By way of reminder, this week’s pre-trial motions hearing in United States v. [read post]
15 Dec 2013, 5:05 pm
But Kozinski was dissenting in United States v. [read post]
14 Dec 2013, 5:54 pm
He finds that in the views of the dissent in the Holm case:the court agrees with Chief Justice Durham['s dissent] that the “purports to marry” prong should be interpreted “as referring to an individual’s claim of entry into a legal union recognized by the state as marriage. [read post]
13 Dec 2013, 9:11 am
In his view, detainees also should be able to be transferred to the United States. [read post]
13 Dec 2013, 8:41 am
State of Punjab (1997), which is a slightly more challenging precedent to understand, the then Chief Justice Ahmadi, speaking on behalf of four judges of a mammoth nine-judge bench, took the view that the doctrine of presumption of constitutionality is not of infinite application and would not apply to a pre-constitutional enactment such as the Punjab Municipal Act, 1911. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 1:02 am
John Jay played a key role in the early years of the fledgling United States. [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 10:50 pm
United States v. [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 12:17 pm
Assistant to the Solicitor General Elaine Goldenberg argued the case for the United States. [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 10:53 am
The Justices were also clearly bothered by the prospect that a ruling in Lozano’s favor might put the United States at odds with other signatories to the Convention; Justice Breyer, for example, told Regan that “every other country is against you. [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 8:32 am
Churn will be sentenced by United States District Court Chief Judge William J. [read post]
10 Dec 2013, 9:01 pm
United States, currently before the U.S. [read post]
