Search for: "Cost v. Cost"
Results 9241 - 9260
of 48,946
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Sep 2016, 4:55 am
Consider Locigno v. 425 West Bagley, Inc. [read post]
30 Sep 2013, 4:09 am
If In Arrant v. [read post]
21 Nov 2013, 6:56 am
§ 553; compensatory and punitive damages on the claim of conversion; costs, including costs incurred for the service of process and the investigation of potential wrongdoing; and attorney's fees. [read post]
28 Feb 2022, 12:55 am
The Law Offices of Leah V. [read post]
16 May 2019, 4:00 am
" The Appellate Division, however, remanded the matter to Supreme Court for further proceedings, explaining that Supreme Court failed to address the Petitioners' request for an award of reasonable attorneys' fees.As the Court of Appeals noted in Matter of Madeiros v New York State Educ. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 11:01 am
” Baker v. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 1:42 pm
Berger Foundation v. [read post]
16 May 2019, 4:00 am
" The Appellate Division, however, remanded the matter to Supreme Court for further proceedings, explaining that Supreme Court failed to address the Petitioners' request for an award of reasonable attorneys' fees.As the Court of Appeals noted in Matter of Madeiros v New York State Educ. [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 5:30 am
The case of U.S. v. [read post]
1 Nov 2012, 9:28 pm
The action followed an action called Castaneda v. [read post]
21 Feb 2018, 5:59 am
" Tyco Fire Products LP v. [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 12:50 pm
Patent trolls know that it costs a lot of money to defend a patent case. [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 4:00 am
Failure to properly maintain records may constitute "spoliation"Zacharius v Kensington Publ. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 9:00 am
I think the answer is no, but he joined a dissenting opinion, written by Chief Justice Roberts, in Armour v. [read post]
9 May 2014, 9:29 am
In Dudek v. [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 5:54 am
In particular, the Appellants have claimed special damages for “costs incurred in preventing identity theft” and “out-of-pocket expenses” and, as noted above, it is to be assumed that these costs have been incurred. [read post]
25 Sep 2014, 6:00 am
See Homestore, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Oct 2013, 10:24 am
In a recent Maryland federal case, EEOC v. [read post]
9 Sep 2020, 12:07 pm
Yothers v. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 4:00 am
" Further, the Appellate Division found that the State's "non-impairment clause" set out in Article V, §7, of the State Constitution was "not implicated as the challenged action does not involve a change directly related to retirement benefits.Considering the Petitioners' arguments challenging the "cost-cutting" measures the City elected to use "to pay for the PPL benefit," the Appellate Division held that the method selected… [read post]
