Search for: "State v. Saide"
Results 9241 - 9260
of 57,117
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jun 2022, 12:00 pm
In a 5-4 decision in Shoop v. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 11:13 am
The California Supreme Court today in a much-anticipated decision, People v. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 7:40 pm
In Roth v. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 3:07 pm
In Walden v. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 7:25 am
The Supreme Court said as much in its 1997 decision in Printz v. [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 6:33 am
“These survey results indicate that MADD and State Farm are on the right track by showing teens that they have the ability to protect not only themselves, but their friends as well,” said Lisa Joyce, State Farm Public Affairs. [read post]
20 May 2021, 7:14 am
Writing separately, Circuit Judge Rawlinson said she would have affirmed the district court’s decision (OTR Wheel Engineering, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 1:54 am
Supreme Court’s decision in Morrison v. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 9:43 am
Take, for example, a hypothetical statute that says that it's illegal "to shoot a flying bird" within 500 feet of a state-owned drone. [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 2:49 pm
Remember: Defendant has never said that he expressly wants the witness to lie. [read post]
11 Sep 2017, 12:43 pm
(i)),1 and the trial court sentenced him to six years in state prison. [read post]
28 Sep 2012, 3:00 pm
In United States v. [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 7:11 pm
The magic trick is said to be covered by the Uniform Trade Secrets Act (UTSA). [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 7:15 pm
See Williams v. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 4:15 am
Administrative decision to be reconsidered after court finds that not all of the arguments of the petitioner were considered by the hearing officerMatter of Cohen v New York State & Local Employees' Retirement Sys., 2011 NY Slip Op 01109, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentThis decision by the Appellate Division illustrates the importance of the administrative hearing officer considering, and ruling on, all of the arguments and theories submitted by a petitioner in the… [read post]
14 Mar 2020, 9:58 am
A different RollsState v. [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 3:35 am
In a summary disposition order filed today, the Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals said HEPA's 120 day statute of repose was a jurisdictional time bar to the petitioners' claims. [read post]
6 May 2009, 4:13 pm
Bowie v. [read post]
6 Dec 2018, 4:16 pm
In Daniels v State of NSW in 2015, she had ruled that the satisfaction of the element of reasonableness was one for the jury. [read post]
21 Sep 2010, 6:00 am
Sure, prior to Shady Grove, some federal courts have looked to state law (e.g., Iorio v. [read post]
