Search for: "United States v. Doe" Results 9241 - 9260 of 44,302
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jul 2012, 2:46 pm by Mali Friedman
District Court for the Northern District of California dismissed all eight claims in Low v. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 5:15 am by Dennis Crouch
The court held that the Canadian-based defendant's actions did not qualify as infringement under Section 271(g)'s proscription against importation-of-a-product-made-by-a-patented-process. 35 USC 271(g): Whoever without authority imports into the United States or offers to sell, sells, or uses within the United States a product which is made by a process patented in the United States shall be liable as an infringer. . . [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 4:08 pm by Mary Love and Devin Ricci
The United States Copyright Office (“USCO”) denied the application because the work “lack[ed] the human authorship necessary to support a copyright claim. [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 3:28 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
CARY PRESS,;No 06-CV-6686 (JFB) (ARL);UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK;2009 U.S. [read post]
14 Feb 2017, 3:16 pm by Amy Howe
United States, the Supreme Court’s 1990 decision holding that the Fourth Amendment does not apply to the search and seizure of a Mexican citizen’s property in Mexico. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 5:06 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
He did not disclose the inventions to anyone in the United States before he applied for United States patents. [read post]
1 Mar 2009, 9:00 pm
"As a moth is drawn to light, so is a litigant drawn to the United States. [read post]