Search for: "AT&T Services Inc. "
Results 9261 - 9280
of 17,734
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Mar 2014, 8:00 am
Planned Parenthood Columbia-Willamette, Inc. [read post]
23 Mar 2014, 5:30 am
Soliciting donations over website not enough for personal jurisdiction DH SERVICES v POSITIVE IMPACT SDNY 2014http://t.co/PkNInRNAz2 -> Do Sesac's licenses violate antitrust laws? [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 8:52 pm
Google, Inc. (9th Circuit Court of Appeals) Background On The Video. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 12:30 pm
One company is Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc., and a related company, Mardel, Inc. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 9:13 am
Over at Law360 Appellate:Sidley Blames E-Notices For Blown Deadline In IP Appeal: "Sidley Austin LLP told the Federal Circuit on Tuesday that it missed the deadline to appeal a $40 million patent verdict against client AT&T Inc. for its U-Verse television service because of misleading notices by the trial court, and that the patent owner's motion to bar the appeal should be denied." [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 8:16 pm
See Brown & Brown, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 2:42 pm
Read More >The post Massachusetts High Court Ruling Shocks Public appeared first on Legislative Intent Service, Inc.. [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 10:12 am
The oddness is not solely a function of the distinction between goods, which have this strict point-of-sale requirement, and services, which don’t, although that is a compelling point. [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 10:11 am
Consistent with Urbino, the Court found, “[t]he employee’s recovery is thus an incentive to perform a service to the state, not restitution for wrongs done to members of the class. [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 4:00 am
The court explained that “[t]his failure to serve a necessary party required the dismissal of the proceeding,” citing Solid Waste Services, Inc. v City of New York, 29 AD3d 318 [leave to appeal denied, 7 NY3d 710].The Appellate Division also sustained the Supreme Court declining to grant Petitioner an extension of time to perfect his appeal “notwithstanding the apparent absence of prejudice,” because of the Article 78 petition's “lack of… [read post]
18 Mar 2014, 10:42 am
., Inc., 2014 WL 989742, No. [read post]
18 Mar 2014, 6:30 am
– David North, Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 4:14 am
At the Law Offices of Matthew T. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 3:37 am
The general rule takes on even greater potency when the buy-out agreement contains provisions effectively waiving the shareholder’s rights to seek additional monies coupled with a merger clause, which is what happened in a case decided last month by the Manhattan-based Appellate Division, First Department, called Jia v Intelli-Tec Security Services, Inc., 2014 NY Slip Op 01384 [1st Dept Feb. 27, 2014]. [read post]
16 Mar 2014, 4:34 pm
Introduction (This is an adapted version of a presentation made at the S.C Bar Convention). [read post]
16 Mar 2014, 4:34 pm
Introduction (This is an adapted version of a presentation made at the S.C Bar Convention). [read post]
15 Mar 2014, 5:12 pm
Explorica, Inc. [read post]
14 Mar 2014, 12:00 pm
(To the extent that all services require talking about them, this doesn’t make much sense, though the larger commercial speech doctrine currently deals with most such problems.) [read post]
14 Mar 2014, 7:40 am
Carnival Brands, Inc., 187 F.3d 1307, 1309 (11th Cir. 1999) (trademark); Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., v. [read post]
14 Mar 2014, 7:20 am
Moving & Storage, Inc. v. [read post]
