Search for: "Office of Hearing and Appeals" Results 9261 - 9280 of 23,859
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jan 2013, 4:18 am by Marty Lederman
On March 26 and 27, the Court will hear oral argument in the same-sex marriage cases, Hollingsworth v. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 7:07 am by Anthony A. Fatemi, LLC
He could not go back to the clerk’s office before the judge held his hearing and didn’t see the report again. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 3:23 am
  So why continue with a losing appeal? [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 6:00 am by Jon Robinson
A recent Court of Appeals filing from the Director of the Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs raises questions about whether the Director has a new interpretation of Section 28(b) of the Longshore and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act (“LHWCA”) or whether the Director has taken inconsistent litigation positions. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 4:07 pm by Giles Peaker
This is a second appeal. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 4:07 pm by Giles Peaker
This is a second appeal. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 7:10 am
  As this site explains, a “Franks Hearing is a hearing to determine whether a police officer's affidavit used to obtain a search warrant that yields incriminating evidence was based on false statements by the police officer. [read post]
22 May 2008, 3:43 am
They relied on the district court's analysis from the Calene hearing. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 4:30 am by Eric Segall
There is another dispute the Justices might hear that could have enormous consequences for private and public higher education in this country. [read post]
4 Dec 2008, 9:54 am
Rowley, the seminal Supreme Court decision, defined the FAPE standard and determined how courts and hearing officers would review IEPs. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 6:14 pm by Scott Bomboy
Circuit Appeals Court in May 2006, after his nomination by President George W. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 9:41 am by Lucy Reed
They should have – the Daily Mail reports on 22 Jan that “Mrs Justice Roberts made her ruling after being reminded by lawyers about the Appeal Court directions” but they later say “High Court Officials announced that a new hearing in the case will be held today “where the judge will bring the attention of counsel to the mandatory aspect of the 2013 guidance”” which rather pulls in the opposite direction). [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 9:41 am by familoo
They should have – the Daily Mail reports on 22 Jan that “Mrs Justice Roberts made her ruling after being reminded by lawyers about the Appeal Court directions” but they later say “High Court Officials announced that a new hearing in the case will be held today “where the judge will bring the attention of counsel to the mandatory aspect of the 2013 guidance”” which rather pulls in the opposite direction). [read post]
4 May 2009, 10:03 am
She could be removed from office if she is found to have violated the state's judicial conduct code.In addition, Rep. [read post]