Search for: "Grant v. State"
Results 9281 - 9300
of 61,360
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Sep 2009, 3:25 am
U.S. v. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 2:08 pm
As a result, environmental permitting (NPDES, Title V, New Source Review) has become far more complex. [read post]
30 Jan 2019, 10:40 am
Elizabeth Murrill is the solicitor general of Louisiana, which joined Utah and 17 other states in a cert-stage amicus brief urging the court to grant Kisor v. [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 6:02 am
Jones v. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 7:44 am
Here are the materials: DCT Memorandum & Order NYC Motion Remaining Defendants’ Cross-Motion An excerpt: For the reasons below, the Court grants the City summary judgment as to defendants’ liability under the CCTA and the CMSA. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 4:15 pm
District Court for the Eastern District of California granted summary judgment for the Plaintiffs in National Association of Wheat Growers et. al. v. [read post]
18 Sep 2017, 5:04 am
Here are the materials in Flandreau Santee Sioux Tribe v. [read post]
21 Feb 2009, 8:39 am
United States v. [read post]
7 Apr 2008, 9:04 am
State v. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 9:20 pm
They are Gill v. [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 8:42 am
State ex rel Kutil & Hess v. [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 7:11 am
U.S. (08-1196), granted review in June, involves a state official and asks whether there must be proof that the accused violated a duty imposed by state law — in that case, a duty to disclose significant information. [read post]
21 Nov 2007, 5:25 pm
Sudduth v. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 9:31 am
Question 1, which the Court agreed to take up, is:Whether the Ninth Circuit's ruling in United States v. [read post]
5 Sep 2015, 8:44 am
Vitalekicked God out of every public school in the United States, no woman had difficulty obtained an abortion after Roe v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 11:45 am
In today’s 6-3 decision in the case of Abbott v. [read post]
10 May 2016, 2:46 pm
In Luis Castro-Ramirez v. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 11:30 pm
A. v. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 1:51 pm
Co. v. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 4:00 am
"The court also noted that the Village was not barred by the doctrine of equitable estoppel from terminating Plaintiff’s post-retirement health care benefits.In McDonald PBA v City of Geneva, 92 N.Y.2d 326, the Court of Appeals concluded that "there is no legal impediment to the municipality's unilateral alteration of the past practice" regarding its providing health insurance benefits to its retirees and their dependents where there was neither a Taylor Law… [read post]
