Search for: "Little v State" Results 9281 - 9300 of 26,846
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Feb 2017, 9:00 pm by Dean Falvy
The Tenure in Office Act was repealed in 1887, and in the case of Myers v. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 2:01 pm by Howard Knopf
The FCA states that:[19] It is not disputed that if Circum’s calculations had been accepted, this would represent a sizeable increase in the royalties to be paid to Access, which it estimates to represent approximately $500,000.00 per year, or $3 million dollars over the two tariff periods. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 2:01 pm by Howard Knopf
The FCA states that:[19] It is not disputed that if Circum’s calculations had been accepted, this would represent a sizeable increase in the royalties to be paid to Access, which it estimates to represent approximately $500,000.00 per year, or $3 million dollars over the two tariff periods. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 8:09 am by Daniel Shaviro
I have more sympathy in principle than he appears to have for using the dormant commerce clause to restrain discrimination against interstate commerce, but the excerpts I’ve read from his concurring opinion in Direct Marketing Association v. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 6:58 am by Michael Geist
Simply put, there is little value in the present Access Copyright licence which now pays a little more than a couple of dollars per student. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 10:05 pm by Walter Olson
Judge Gorsuch has been at the vanguard of applying originalism to the questions raised by today’s Leviathan state, which is increasingly controlled by unaccountable executive agencies. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 8:46 pm by Howard Friedman
Appx. 562 (2014) he wrote a unanimous opinion upholding a prison regulation that requires inmates wishing to use their religious name on their mail to also use their committed name along with it.⇾In Little Sisters of the Poor Home for the Aged v. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 6:15 pm by Amy Howe
When the Little Sisters of the Poor failed to garner enough votes for rehearing in the 10th Circuit, Gorsuch joined a dissent by Judge Harris Hartz that described the three-judge panel’s decision for the government as “clearly and gravely wrong – on an issue that has little to do with contraception and a great deal to do with religious liberty. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 3:44 am by Edith Roberts
” Briefly: At the Council of State Governments’ Knowledge Center blog, Lisa Soronen discusses Packingham v. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 9:28 am by Caroline Lynch
Last summer the Second Circuit ruled in Microsoft Corp. v. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 8:27 am by Gerard N. Magliocca
Last fall, a panel of the Seventh Circuit handed down Exodus Refugee Immigration, Inc. v. [read post]