Search for: "State v. Levell " Results 9281 - 9300 of 28,752
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Oct 2024, 1:34 am by INFORRM
The 17 October 2024 was the final day for European Union Member States to implement the necessary measures for transposing the EU Directive on measures for a high common level of cybersecurity across the EU into their national laws. [read post]
30 Nov 2016, 12:50 pm by Kate Howard
Cronic prejudice standard applies (as every other state and federal court to consider the question has held), or whether the Strickland v. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 3:56 pm
In a case regarding subsequent offense DUI convictions from the State of Montana, State v. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 4:57 am by Daithí
Last month’s decision of the US Supreme Court in Brown v Entertainment Merchants’ Association (PDF) (formerly Schwarzenegger v VSDA) has attracted a lot of attention. [read post]
25 Jul 2010, 12:10 pm by David Smith
He distinguished himself from the other Defendants and pointed out that his occupancy of PSG was at a much lower level. [read post]
25 Jul 2010, 12:10 pm by David Smith
He distinguished himself from the other Defendants and pointed out that his occupancy of PSG was at a much lower level. [read post]
23 Nov 2022, 7:37 am by Sasha Volokh
For instance, a state government can't delegate to a church the power to veto the licensing of a bar—that's the doctrine of Larkin v. [read post]
8 Feb 2015, 3:00 pm by Cyrus Farivar
While a warrant requirement for e-mail is unlikely to be passed at the federal level anytime soon (despite yet another recently introduced bill), a California state senator wants his home state to do just that. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 4:54 am by Sean Wajert
The few states that recognize medical monitoring as a remedy recognize it as a cause of action, like Pennsylvania, Redland Soccer Club, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 11:16 am by Tejinder Singh
Tomorrow the Court will hear argument in Vasquez v. [read post]
15 Apr 2016, 6:44 am by Amy Howe
Over forty years ago, it insists, the Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]