Search for: "AMP, INC. v. United States" Results 9301 - 9320 of 11,015
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Apr 2024, 7:53 am by Marie Nganele
This approach is based on a 1985 appeals court case called Chattel Shipping and Investment, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 1:23 am by Steve Baird
Supreme Court has not yet decided to review the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals decision in B &B Hardware, Inc. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 2:19 am by INFORRM
United States The defamation trial against HBO over a “hoax” child labour report has begun with a statement by the attorney for Mitre Sports International. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 2:30 pm by Joel R. Brandes
Both of these adjustments are based on increases in the Consumer Price Index for all urban consumers (CPI-U) published by the United States Department of Labor. [read post]
25 Jan 2022, 2:46 pm by Patricia Hughes
(Moloney, Gascon J., para. 18) However, there is not necessarily a conflict when the provincial law is more restrictive than the federal enactment: Gascon J. cites Rothmans, Benson & Hedges Inc. v. [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 10:02 am by John Elwood
” He got the hint and filed an amicus brief expressing the views of the United States. [read post]
23 May 2008, 1:03 am
– Brdo: (IPR-Helpdesk), 5-6 June: USFDA public meeting on evaluation of product trade names: (FDA Law Blog), 9-12 June: (US) Strategies for management of IP – Chicago: (IPR-Helpdesk), 11 June: MARQUES ‘First meeting with Spanish Judges of the Community Trade Mark Courts’ – Alicante: (Class 46), 16 June / 1 July: US PLI: ‘Prior art &;amp; obviousness 2008: The PTO and… [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 5:12 am
Frontline (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) No extensions allowed – California District Court finds that non-functional use of file extension may be trade marked: Autodesk, Inc. v Dassault Systemes SolidWorks Corp. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 6:02 pm by Duncan
Frontline (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) No extensions allowed – California District Court finds that non-functional use of file extension may be trade marked: Autodesk, Inc. v Dassault Systemes SolidWorks Corp. [read post]