Search for: "All Other Claimants"
Results 9301 - 9320
of 12,895
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Feb 2012, 6:18 am
The Court of Appeal today dismissed Mr Glenn Mulcaire’s appeal against an order that he provide information to claimants in the phone hacking litigation ([2012] EWCA Civ 48). [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 4:25 am
Why fix a system that is has been proven in study after study to work better than in any other state in the nation? [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 8:10 pm
It’s no good giving all the profit costs a single item number. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 5:47 am
Whether a dispute pertaining to cancellation of works contract can be brought before the Tribunal under 1983 Law or not:Section 2(1)(i) defines "works-contract" to mean a written agreement for the execution of any work relating to works of the State Government or State Government PSU (“MP PSU”) and includes an agreement for the supply of goods or material and all other matters relating to the execution of any of the said works. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 5:46 am
Claims for those damages must come, if at all, in the more individualized Phase II damages proceedings. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 5:36 am
Liddell’s article should be required reading for all judges with an asbestos docket, as well as all policy makers and legislators who tackle asbestos issues.) [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 4:46 am
" In addition, the insurer has not provided any other evidence that would indicate that Juarlesa W. is not disabled. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 8:59 pm
The current Part 47.18 creates a presumption in favour of the receiving party but then says at Part 47.18(2): “In deciding whether to make some other order, the court must have regard to all the circumstances, including – (a) the conduct of all the parties; (b) the amount, if any, by which the bill of costs has been reduced; and (c) whether it was reasonable for a party to claim the costs of a particular item or to dispute that item. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 5:23 pm
Special Advocates: As revealed on this blog, the “Special Advocates” who already play the central role in closed hearings in relation to immigration and control order hearings, are strongly against the proposals. 57 of them, including 19 Queen’s Counsel, say the proposals “represent a departure from the foundational principle of natural justice that all parties are entitled to see and challenge all the evidence relied upon before the court and to combat that… [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 5:15 pm
The report found that 22% of all claims from 2002 to 2009 were rejected. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 6:46 am
Do the users have to wait until the criminal charges are resolved before they seek to intervene as claimants in the forfeiture portion of the case? [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 3:21 am
All Rights Reserved.. [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 12:00 pm
Costs of £8882.40 were ordered against the Claimant. [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 12:00 pm
Costs of £8882.40 were ordered against the Claimant. [read post]
28 Jan 2012, 9:36 pm
The other would be not to raise 41 (5) objection, enter in the ordinary proceedings, which will necessarily be longer and more expensive than the summary proceedings, but expect to recover all the costs from the Claimant if the claim proves to be patently unfounded. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 12:52 pm
The district court determined that California law could be applied to all class members, because Honda had failed to show how differences in the various states’ laws were material, how other states had an interest in applying their laws in this case, and how those interests were implicated. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 9:47 am
Documents filed as provided by other statutes: This section provides that documents that are now “filed” pursuant to other laws be recorded and indexed with recorded documents using the same methods. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 5:47 am
The consent exception is based upon the same premise as the other exceptions, that is to say that giving less than 72 hours’ notice and in some cases virtually no notice at all, does not give rise to a very high risk that the right of access to justice is being and will be infringed. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 2:12 am
Counsel reiterated that section 2(2) of the Act is an “affirmative” provision and not one that excludes the jurisdiction of the Indian court, and emphasised that section 2(5), which provides that the 1996 Act applies to “all arbitrations”, has been made subject to section 2(4) but not to section 2(2). [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 4:19 pm
(WCxKit) Left unchecked, double-dipping and other workers comp fraud can lead to higher premiums for all Texas employers. [read post]
