Search for: "LARGE v. LARGE"
Results 9301 - 9320
of 40,644
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jan 2020, 10:15 am
The 2016 case of Hecht v. [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 9:41 am
Under Remmer v. [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 6:52 am
The living room is topped by a large circular dome with a Venetian plaster finish. [read post]
12 Jan 2020, 9:33 pm
Although “some of the government’s tactics here leave something to be desired,” a unanimous panel in US v. [read post]
12 Jan 2020, 8:23 pm
Gary Lawson, writing on Gundy v. [read post]
12 Jan 2020, 6:47 pm
The Ontario Court of Appeal reviewed one such case in Perkins v. [read post]
12 Jan 2020, 2:24 pm
In Blancarte v. [read post]
11 Jan 2020, 8:26 pm
In U.S. v. [read post]
11 Jan 2020, 1:19 pm
Liaw v Sohal. [read post]
11 Jan 2020, 10:55 am
. [* * *] In Morrissey v. [read post]
11 Jan 2020, 5:29 am
In Abou-Haidar, v. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 1:49 pm
And I'll admit that maybe if the requested fees here had been a fair piece smaller -- rather than asking for nearly a quarter million dollars for a case that was not hard at all (the facts largely speak for themselves) -- I might have been more sympathetic to the fee request.But, in the end, Villarreal gets what he needs, his lawyer asks for a ton, and the Court of Appeal ends the case the way it should.A decent way to end the week. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 11:56 am
Among the most important outstanding issues as impeachment moves to the Senate is whether senators will attempt to obtain the testimony of senior executive branch officials who have, to date, declined to testify. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 11:56 am
Although the House could have potentially forced the executive branch to confront the distinct nature and substantial weight of the legislators’ need for factual information in an impeachment inquiry, legislators largely allowed the executive branch to take refuge in broad prophylactic doctrines that eliminated any need to consider Congress’s interests. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 11:37 am
Stark in Cirba Inc. d/b/a Densify) et al. v. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 11:37 am
Stark in Cirba Inc. d/b/a Densify) et al. v. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 5:59 am
In reaching this conclusion, the court observed, inter alia, that (i) the façade of Kunsthal Charlottenborg carried two large signs (80 x 120 cm) informing of the Ai Weiwei exhibition, and (ii) the exhibition had been the subject of massive media covered in June and July 2017.As for the measure of damages to Ai Weiwei, the court’s decision is favorable and seems, perhaps, to break with the Danish courts’ general tradition of modesty in awarding damages for IP… [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 5:00 am
In the case of Rau v. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 12:25 am
In addressing the first criteria the CJEU stated that the "act of communication" is to be construed broadly and making a hyperlink available, even if the user does not click on it, is itself an act of communication.In addressing the second criteria, the CJEU stated that term "public" means an indeterminate and fairly large number of potential recipients. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 12:24 am
” [at 25].3 CostsThe applicable rule is CPR rule 44.2, that the unsuccessful party will be ordered to pay the costs of the successful party, but the court may make a different order, considering all the circumstances, including the conduct of the parties, whether a party has succeeded on part of its case, even if that party has not been wholly successful, and any admissible offers to settle.Birss stated that his conclusion was, broadly, that Warner and Sony succeeded on the large… [read post]
