Search for: "Mays v. State"
Results 9301 - 9320
of 119,555
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Aug 2009, 3:20 am
Per Heard v. [read post]
2 Mar 2025, 9:34 am
Olsen and United States v. [read post]
12 Feb 2013, 11:35 am
United States and Klamath Irrigation District v. [read post]
4 May 2016, 3:10 pm
(Trademarks - Washington Football Team) on May 2, 2016, and in Pauma Band of Mission Indians v. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 4:00 am
Essential considerations in a court’s review of an administrative decision after an administrative hearing required by lawWillis v New York State Liq. [read post]
18 Apr 2015, 4:03 am
What many people may not be aware of is that if an individual has registered with the Telephone Preference Service, these calls are unlawful and the company responsible may be fined. [read post]
24 Jan 2025, 5:01 am
This week, I've blogged on a forthcoming article about the Supreme Court case Tyler v. [read post]
5 Jan 2009, 2:00 pm
Board of Regents of the University of California, that may be of interest in Texas. [read post]
9 Jul 2007, 10:33 am
The Ninth Circuit held Friday in United States v. [read post]
6 May 2010, 10:49 am
State v. [read post]
4 Apr 2023, 6:32 am
Google, Zhang v. [read post]
19 Jun 2008, 2:04 pm
The Supreme Court ruled by a 7-2 vote on Thursday that a state may require a criminal defendant who suffers from a mental illness to have a lawyer, rather than allowing the individual to act as his own defense counsel, even when the individual is competent enough to be tried. [read post]
10 Oct 2007, 10:56 am
On October 10, 2007, the United States Patent and Trademark Office publishedExamination Guidelines for Determining Obviousness Under 35 U.S.C. 103 in View of the Supreme Court Decision in KSR International Co. v. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 3:10 pm
State v. [read post]
12 Jun 2021, 7:32 am
The post More Perspectives About Van Buren v. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 8:08 am
In Atwood v. [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 2:33 pm
United States, and the extent to which the Court may need to use an application for extraordinary relief (perhaps including an "original" writ of habeas corpus) to resolve that split--given (1) the unavailability of certiorari to review denials of second-or-successive habeas petitions; (2) government's agreement that Johnson may be retroactively enforced; and (3) the one-year statute of limitations, which likely requires all Johnson-based claims to be filed… [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 9:00 am
State, a video of a man using mouthwash as a decongestant may have been the difference for the jury, which found him guilty of murdering his daughter. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 8:00 am
United States v. [read post]
12 Aug 2012, 3:45 am
In the recent opinion State v. [read post]
