Search for: "True v True" Results 9301 - 9320 of 33,964
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Oct 2018, 8:07 am by Florian Mueller
There are differences for sure, still it's true that the Massachusetts decision shows Super Sack isn't as absolute and comprehensive as some would have it.The highlight of Qualcomm's reply is a true "gotcha" moment:"Apple previously admitted that Qualcomm's position here is correct: “Qualcomm always has the power to remove the Nine Patents by granting Apple a covenant-not-to-sue pursuant to Super Sack.' [...] [read post]
13 Oct 2018, 4:19 pm by INFORRM
Prior to a conviction being deemed spent, a convicted person has no reasonable expectation of privacy: NT1 & NT2 v Google LLC v The Information Commissioner [2018] EWHC 799 (QB) (“NT”), per Warby J at [166]. [read post]
12 Oct 2018, 4:17 pm by INFORRM
There is a threshold requirement: in order to be actionable, an interference must attain a certain level of seriousness (McKennitt v Ash [2008] QB 73[12], Ambrosiadou v Coward [2011] EMLR 21 [28]–[30]). [read post]
11 Oct 2018, 1:01 pm by Ronald Mann
Wednesday morning the justices got a rare opportunity to ponder basic principles of tort law, as they closed the October session with the argument in Air and Liquid Systems v. [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 6:32 pm by Larry
Take a look at Texport Oil Co. v. [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 12:40 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  Whether it is British Petroleum struggling to handle the aftermath of an oil refinery explosion killing 15 Alaskan workers; Wells Fargo adjusting its operations after a massive company fraud committed by 5,300 employees against over two million customer accounts; or any company experiencing a threat to its customers, the same lesson always rings true. [read post]