Search for: "ADOPTION OF S E"
Results 9321 - 9340
of 15,181
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jan 2013, 2:06 pm
And if there’s one thing that’s not right, it’s having the liability of a defendant non-manufacturer turn on what its competitors did (or didn’t do). [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 7:22 am
” The court of appeals then adopted the U.S. [read post]
17 Jan 2013, 4:12 pm
Covered entities are urged to heed these warning by strengthening their HIPAA compliance and adopting other suitable safeguards to minimize HIPAA exposures. [read post]
17 Jan 2013, 1:54 pm
What’s the background on this law? [read post]
17 Jan 2013, 1:05 pm
The ALJ found that they weren’t ads, but the Commission didn’t adopt that ruling. [read post]
17 Jan 2013, 11:12 am
The proposal issued earlier this year, Sixth FNPRM, seeks further comment on a number of issues relating to the FCC’s ownership reports for commercial and noncommercial broadcast stations, FCC Forms 323 and 323-E. [read post]
17 Jan 2013, 9:56 am
No doubt, if the Max Planck recommendation of needing an intention to use is adopted, OHIM will have a “tick that you have an intention to use the whole class box” too". [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 11:40 am
Because the accused websites do not contain every claim limitation, they do not literally infringe.The CAFC would not re-write the patent:If Parallel’s position were adopted, it would permit the broad term “associated with” to effectively rewrite the patent.Parallel did not make out well in footnote 2:We also reject Parallel’s related argument that the district court’s use of “combine” rather than “generate”… [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 8:11 am
THOMAS E. [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 6:30 am
You can reach him by e-mail at gates at law.ucla.edu [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 3:30 am
E. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 11:30 am
You can reach him by e-mail at yoshinok at exchange.law.nyu.edu [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 9:35 am
” Section 332(c)(7)(A) provides that “[e]xcept as provided in this paragraph, nothing in this chapter shall limit or affect” state and local authority over siting decisions. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 6:20 pm
At Duk,e the true believers—the Group of 88 and allies—largely went silent once the administration adopted its “let’s-move-on” mantra. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 3:39 pm
Ladies and Gents, let’s have a cookin’ session tonight, the bar is open ! [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 7:52 am
Notwithstanding OESS’s discretionary application of its enforcement authority, CMS emphasizes that the compliance date for using the operating rules remains January 1, 2013. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 6:30 am
You can reach him by e-mail at dcruz at law.usc.edu [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 4:51 am
The amendments copy directly from the exception in Item 407(e)(3)(iii) of Regulation S-K with respect to the proxy disclosure rules for compensation consultants. [read post]
11 Jan 2013, 11:12 am
[T]he New York Court of Appeals has not adopted it . . . and plaintiff cannot even cite an Appellate Division decision adopting the section. [read post]
11 Jan 2013, 10:40 am
Matt ColesFor the Conference on Liberty/Equality: The View from Roe’s 40th and Lawrence’s 10th Anniversaries Many of the Supreme Court’s more recent decisions suggest that the Court has adopted Justice Scalia’s ideas about how it should decide if the due process clause gives special protection to an aspect of freedom not explicitly mentioned in the Constitution. [read post]
