Search for: "CONVERSE v CONVERSE" Results 9321 - 9340 of 15,441
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jul 2013, 10:39 am by Larry Catá Backer
(Pix (c) Larry Catá Backer 2013) In his 2004 Storrs Lecture, Gunther Teubner asked:how is constitutional theory to respond to the challenge arising form three current major trends—digitization, privatization and globalization—for the inclusion/exclusion problem? [read post]
17 Jul 2013, 4:47 pm by Steve Sady
In Descamps, Justice Kagan wrote for the Supreme Court on an issue that permeates our work as federal defenders: what impact do prior convictions have on our clients’ freedom? [read post]
17 Jul 2013, 12:46 pm by Brandy Robinson, EDMI
  Rather, because Jeter only “paused briefly,” never engaged in conversation, and ignored the officers’ requests, the Court believed California v. [read post]
17 Jul 2013, 5:19 am by Susan Brenner
During his conversation with [Wright-Darrisaw], Blackerby sat in a chair facing [her] while she sat across the bench. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 11:42 am
When evaluating fault, it's not simply a jaywalking v. not jaywalking analysis. [read post]
14 Jul 2013, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
While Congress exercises considerable control over the appellate jurisdiction of the Supreme Court, since the landmark decision in Marbury v. [read post]
12 Jul 2013, 6:53 am by Josh Sturtevant
It seems incredible for so many reasons that I first published the reprinted post below over a year ago...The Dual Critical Role and Culpability of the Media in State v. [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 6:19 pm by Larry Catá Backer
Conversely, productive property owned or controlled by individuals, especially where that ownership is not under state control or direction, could be understood as a challenge to the unity of the people and a political threat. [read post]