Search for: "STATE v. SMALL"
Results 9321 - 9340
of 16,894
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Apr 2014, 3:36 pm
The best interests of children are a primary consideration: see, for example, R (JS) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2013] EWHC 3350 (QB) per Elias LJ at paras 42 to 46. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 3:36 pm
The best interests of children are a primary consideration: see, for example, R (JS) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2013] EWHC 3350 (QB) per Elias LJ at paras 42 to 46. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 11:59 am
Before Tuesday’s oral arguments in American Broadcasting Companies v. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 5:00 am
The Supreme Court and most state courts consider any ratio above 10:1 presumptively unconstitutional. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 4:34 am
McIntosh had a small abrasion on her knee from the fall. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 4:00 am
Using the example of R. v. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 3:08 pm
Many of the proposed solutions come from outside the United States, although a few have also been seen in the U.S., albeit in small numbers. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 2:35 pm
This morning, the Supreme Court released its decision in Paroline v. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 11:16 am
With a hat tip to Docket Navigator for the eye–popping order in Versata Software, Inc. et al. v. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 9:45 am
After months of anticipation, the Supreme Court of Florida has issued its much-awaited decision in Estate of McCall v. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 7:44 am
In the case of Braintree v. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 9:01 pm
Three Fault Lines in the Michigan Case Although the ruling in Schuette is obviously important for Michigan and other states that have adopted state constitutional bans on affirmative action, its direct doctrinal impact is likely to be small. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 6:05 pm
The Case of Navarette v. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 9:54 am
Travis Medlock v. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 9:38 am
RT: nonidentical state laws—you can’t enforce the FDCA but you can enforce state laws identical to those of the FDCA. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 7:41 am
In Eisai Co. v. [read post]
21 Apr 2014, 3:59 pm
In Wesson v. [read post]
21 Apr 2014, 8:48 am
When the no-chance-in-hell-on-appeal argument was raised in Anders v. [read post]
21 Apr 2014, 7:23 am
Federal Express Corp., 564 F.3d 507, 516 (1st Cir. 2009) (defining “intimidation” as to put another in fear); State v. [read post]
20 Apr 2014, 9:06 am
State v. [read post]
