Search for: "State v. Word" Results 9321 - 9340 of 40,668
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jan 2014, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
The “Rule of Necessity” permits a tribunal, the members of which could be affected by the decision, to decide a case or controversyPines, et. al. v State of New York, 2014 NY Slip Op 00335, Appellate Division, Second DepartmentIn deciding an action initiated by Emily Pines and other judges, Supreme Court that held that “the compensation of judges and justices of the Unified Court System of the State of New York was duly increased pursuant to the Laws of… [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 6:08 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The question here is whether New York State committed defamation per se when it used plaintiff's photo without her permission in an HIV/anti-discrimination public service announcement.The case is Nolan v. [read post]
29 Sep 2013, 5:53 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
They even have the right to give the Quran to a prison guard.The case is Washington v. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 7:17 pm by Kenneth J. Vanko
In other words, the employee could not vend any kind of product or service to a Lapolla competitor. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 9:17 pm by Timothy P. Flynn
 Generally, when a litigant loses a trial, our system of justice provides for a second look; the trial judge is not the final word in any given case.When a losing litigant becomes an appellant, the case is assigned, in both state and federal courts, to a 3-judge panel to decide the matter via majority vote. [read post]
28 Nov 2007, 3:54 am
Yesterday afternoon I debated Robert Levy of the Cato Institute, one of the lawyers for the plaintiffs in Heller v. [read post]
3 Dec 2008, 1:16 pm
  Wexler is a former Ginsburg clerk and prolific writer who has written a book (due out next summer) about the church-and-state dilemma in America. [read post]