Search for: "Does 1-27" Results 9341 - 9360 of 12,455
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Apr 2022, 1:12 pm by Public Employment Law Press
Decided on April 27, 2022 No. 60 [*1]In the Matter of Tim Harkenrider, et al., Respondents-Appellants, vKathy Hochul, & c., et al., Appellants-Respondents, et al., Respondents. [read post]
21 Dec 2020, 11:56 am by Phil Dixon
Specifically, the defendant argues the evidence does not show that he used actual force, fraud, or trickery to remove the victim. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 4:31 am by Norman L. Eisen
He has now taken testimony from two of the most important witnesses in the case, former Vice President Pence[1] and Trump’s former Chief of Staff Mark Meadows,[2] and recently interviewed a third, Trump’s personal lawyer Rudy Giuliani.[3] Smith has also taken testimony from an array of other key witnesses including: former White House Counsel Pat Cipollone,[4] his former deputy Pat Philbin,[5] former White House Deputy Chief of Staff Dan Scavino,[6] former National Security… [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 1:24 pm by Roy Ginsburg
This does not mean merely that they have all suffered a violation of the same provision of law. . . . [read post]
23 Dec 2012, 3:26 pm by David Cheifetz
Canada (Attorney General), 2005 SCC 25, [2005] 1 S.C.R. 401. [143] This was a complex medical malpractice case. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 1:11 pm by Kevin LaCroix
A plaintiff does not need to allege reliance, scienter nor loss causation to succeed on a Section 11 claim or a Section 12(a)(2) claim. [read post]
11 Jul 2010, 8:28 am by Veronika Gaertner
The court held that a seller’s claim based on his reservation of title does not fall under Art. 1 II lit. b) EuGVVO. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 2:59 am
 He said that decision probably won't be made for another 1 1/2 years.In California, Ralph Montano, spokesman for the state's Department of Public Health, said that the California Retail Food Safety Coalition is currently discussing updates to the code to mirror changes to the FDA Food Code. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 5:58 am by Bernard Bell
United States, 533 U.S. 27, 32-33 (2001)(Scalia, J.). [read post]
9 Apr 2020, 4:00 am by Ken Chasse
He does so on the assumption that the law societies’ mandates are fulfilled by inexpert and unsupported volunteer benchers. [read post]
24 Nov 2012, 12:38 pm by Schachtman
Still, the search for a RR threshold for general causation does have some basis in the practice of epidemiology. [read post]
25 Aug 2024, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar and Ashutosh Bhagwat
Under current doctrine, the key to establishing a violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Act, the antitrust law invoked by X, is to prove the existence of an agreement (typically among competitors) that has an anticompetitive purpose and effect—the language of Section 1 prohibits “every contract, combination . . . or conspiracy, in restraint of trade or commerce. [read post]
7 Sep 2015, 2:47 pm by Kevin LaCroix
However, the court held, the bylaw does not apply to the officers. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 2:26 am by INFORRM
 In Re D [2008] 1 WLR 1499 at [27] Lord Carswell approved what had been said by Richards LJ in R (N) v Mental Health Review Tribunal (Northern Region) [2006] QB 468 at [62] who had said, ‘Although there is a single civil standard of proof on the balance of probabilities, it is flexible in its application. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 7:19 pm by Frank Pasquale
Let’s take criticism of each step of the argument in turn. 1) Legitimation: Some want to stop the conversation at point 1, arguing that there is no need to legitimate inequality, and no way to fairly or efficiently remedy it. [read post]