Search for: "Herring v. State"
Results 9341 - 9360
of 58,128
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Dec 2016, 1:35 pm
& A. 1943) (stating in a will context Such burden does not shi [read post]
15 Apr 2015, 11:19 am
95 N.Y.2d 368 740 N.E.2d 1075 718 N.Y.S.2d 1 THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent-Appellant, v. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 7:01 am
” In the case, Mansifield v. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 7:01 am
” In the case, Mansifield v. [read post]
19 Jan 2009, 11:53 am
United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 10:58 am
The Court overrules not only Roe v. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 10:16 am
–State v. [read post]
3 Sep 2012, 3:59 am
State v. [read post]
30 Aug 2024, 2:53 pm
" Accord State v. [read post]
30 Oct 2008, 6:43 pm
., United States v. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 1:21 pm
would enlarge what actually passed to the State, at the time of her admission, under the constitutional rule of equality here invoked.' 260 U. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 6:10 am
United States, which was argued in November. [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 5:39 am
") SC19336 Concurrence - State v. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 5:57 am
The cite for that is Albert v. [read post]
18 Oct 2013, 6:01 am
State v. [read post]
1 May 2017, 1:45 pm
In Gallardo v. [read post]
15 Aug 2017, 8:00 am
"Citing two decisions by the Supreme Court, Delaware State College v Ricks, 449 U.S. 25 and Chardon v Fernandez, 454 U.S. 6, the Second Circuit held that plaintiff's notice of termination in this case may, itself, constitute an adverse employment action notwithstanding its revocation before it became effective for the purpose of litigating an alleged unlawful discrimination or other claim.Although in this action the court found that the rescission of a notice of… [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 5:48 am
") AC34684 - State v. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 2:21 pm
Courts of Appeals Bulletin - find case summaries and links to source documents at:http://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/cta/2014cta.htmlUnited States v. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 7:41 am
In this instance, said the Appellate Division, the crux of Razzano’s threshold claim is that the reclassification and subsequent "excessing" of her employment from her full-time position and her “reinstatement” to a part-time position was undertaken in bad faith in that it was effected in retaliation for her engagement in a protected activity, in violation of the New York State Public Sector Whistleblower Law (see Civil Service… [read post]
