Search for: "Lively v. State" Results 9361 - 9380 of 29,029
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Mar 2018, 8:56 am by Thorsten Bausch
Therefore, what the member states earn in official fees, they will typically lose in corporate or income taxes. [read post]
30 Mar 2018, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (Stott) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 18 Jan 2018. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 9:30 pm by Raphael Murillo
In response to the dramatic expansion of the Spanish Crown during Emperor Charles V’s reign, elites in the court and the Emperor himself typically employed inspections as a means of collecting records and reports. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 12:39 pm
  As well as in any other state with a similarly-worded statute. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 11:28 am by Amy Howe
Two months later, the justices announced that they would also review the Maryland case, known in the Supreme Court as Benisek v. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 8:56 am by Scott Bomboy
The amendment proposed for ratification included language never used before but permitted under Article V: state conventions (and not state legislatures) would be called for ratification votes, out of fear the temperance lobby would influence state lawmakers. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 11:39 am by Howard M. Wasserman
The first was the United States, which is composed of states united into one mass or body, although all agree that entry into the union does not deprive a state of its distinct and individual existence. [read post]