Search for: "State v. Mark"
Results 9361 - 9380
of 19,265
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Apr 2007, 3:27 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKIntellectual PropertyClaim for Service Marks' Infringement Dismissed; Underlying Issue Is Legitimacy of State Registration Bonato v. [read post]
26 Dec 2006, 1:17 am
Mark Buick Pontiac GMC U.S. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 1:48 am
State of New York [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 6:51 am
In Maples v. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 5:19 am
Court of Appeals for the 2d Circuit2003) (internal quotation marks omitted).Ellora's Cave Publishing, Inc., et al. v. [read post]
8 Nov 2014, 5:53 pm
United States v. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 5:49 am
United States Polo Association v. [read post]
[Paul Cassell] Is Membership in a Conservation Organization Proof of Criminal Intent to Harm Cattle?
9 Jul 2018, 3:30 am
For example, in Dawson v. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 1:07 pm
Grubbs v. [read post]
18 Dec 2012, 2:38 pm
The two words were brought together in the Chancery Division of the High Court, England and Wales, in Population Diagnostics Inc v The Comptroller General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks [2012] EWHC 3541 (Ch), a decision from last Thursday by Mr Justice Warren in an appeal against the refusal of Mrs Chalmers, on behalf of the UK's Intellectual Property Office, to grant two somewhat curious patent applications. [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 11:26 am
Beachbody, LLC v. [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 1:18 pm
Co. of Connecticut v. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 2:46 pm
In an amicus brief [here] filed with the Supreme Court last Friday in Sandifer v. [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 5:55 am
By clarifying the mental state in this way, legislation would punish only knowing betrayals of someone’s privacy. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 9:08 am
United States v. [read post]
19 Jul 2015, 6:20 am
V for victory sign introduced. [read post]
24 Feb 2022, 6:18 pm
The context for this dispute flows out of the earlier (and un-appealed) CIT decision in Energizer v. [read post]
31 Jan 2014, 8:13 am
On Afro-IP, Caroline Ncube relates the tale of a South African wine brand dispute (Alto v Altus) which ended with Altus preferring a name change (to Fenix) to the prospect of defending a trade mark infringement claim. [read post]
29 May 2009, 6:41 am
Cassady v. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 9:30 am
The Second District, in its recent decision in People v. [read post]
