Search for: "Strong v. State"
Results 9361 - 9380
of 16,403
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Feb 2014, 7:26 am
Inconsistency isn’t itself a vice, but there’s a particular problem when the inconsistency favors the presently powerful and dominant, which is explicitly what trademark law does: it protects strong brands more than new or weak entrants, and dilution in particular only protects famous marks, which is to say household names.So I’ve identified a tension in the treatment of private torts targeting emotional methods of persuasion. [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 5:14 am
There are strong parallels to the press. [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 4:36 am
Issues like federalism and state action doctrine do bear on 1A issues. [read post]
15 Feb 2014, 8:28 am
Turning to detainee news: Wells reported the much awaited DC panel decision in the Guantanamo force-feeding case, Aamer v. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 11:33 am
The arguments against the former, especially in Roper v. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 10:01 am
We are told we have enjoyed some of our trips to the state.) [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 5:37 am
And although there was no direct indication that he had authority over her hiring, firing, promotions, compensation, or benefits, the statement that he was a manager and husband to the mother of the owner was enough under Vance v Ball State Univ. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 9:01 pm
The three-judge panel there held that, in light of the Supreme Court’s decision last summer in United States v. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 6:48 pm
Being able to express strong feelings and emotions appropriately in a manner that does not derail the communication is also important. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 1:12 pm
Substantially larger stakes were held in foreign equities from developed states (almost 25%) and developing states (about 9%). [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 10:48 am
As Justice Sotomayor wrote in United States v. [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 8:30 am
The issue in Solvay v. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 1:48 pm
This case, Medtronic, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 1:48 pm
This case, Medtronic, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 10:48 am
This case, Medtronic, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 1:57 pm
Lastly, a state registration will have a strong deterrent effect on third parties because the state registration will appear in trademark search reports. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 10:16 am
In Americans United for Separation of Church & State v. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 7:23 am
The defendants’ motions to dismiss were granted (Duke v Hamil, February 4, 2014, Story, R). [read post]
9 Feb 2014, 8:54 pm
Based upon the oral argument during the recently-concluded January term, it is not clear what the Illinois Supreme Court is likely to decide in Nelson v. [read post]
9 Feb 2014, 2:27 pm
Perry v Truefitt, 49 ER 749 stated that ‘A man is not to sell his own goods under pretence that they are the goods of another man. [read post]
