Search for: "Bank Line v. United States" Results 921 - 940 of 1,379
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jan 2012, 12:35 pm by Employment Services
The United States Supreme Court issued two decisions last year that are likely to increase the number of retaliation lawsuits because they expand the scope of protection. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 9:50 am by Zak Gowen
  And will the antitrust agencies develop any bright-line rules, similar to merger presumptions, to evaluate these transactions? [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 5:59 am by Satya Marar
Analyzing the Deal The merged firm would be the sixth-largest bank in the United States by total assets and deposits. [read post]
3 Jul 2016, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
United States Kanye West’s music video for “Famous” has sparked outrage for portraying naked celebrities in bed, in the form of life-like wax figures, and IPKat has looked at whether those portrayed can use publicity rights. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 9:00 pm by Kyle Hulehan
Notably, Romer and Romer’s study was completed with U.S. federal income tax data, not state level data. [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 8:22 am by Dennis Crouch
Hospira, Inc., No. 15-1210 (bright line limits on secondary indicia of nonobviousness) [CubistPetition] Infringement by Joint Enterprise: Limelight Networks, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 8:05 am
In 1993, the Swaps Monitor, an industry newsletter, reported that the derivatives market amounted to a total of US$24 trillion, representing approximately four times the size of America’s domestic product by that time. [3] Just recently, the International Swaps and Derivatives Association reported that at the end of 2006 the derivatives market amounted US$283 trillion, an exorbitant amount when compared with the US$34 trillion resulting from the sum of the gross domestic product of the… [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 5:20 am
(See, among a zillion examples, anti-miscegenation laws after Loving v. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 4:15 am
: Line One Laboratories Inc v California Exotic Novelties LLC (not precedential) (TTABlog) ITC: Initial determination finding violation of s 337 (trade mark and copyright infringement) in energy drink investigation based on complaint by Red Bull (ITC 337 Law Blog)     [read post]
28 Apr 2013, 8:40 am
Reciting Seager v Copydex and Banks v EMI Songs, the former judge stated that 'where an inventor wanted to sell his idea for money, money is what he got'. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 9:33 am by Myron Orfield
As Richard Nixon’s HUD secretary and attorney general, they brought the case that persuaded the Eighth Circuit: United States v. [read post]