Search for: "Branch v. United States" Results 921 - 940 of 4,103
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Apr 2009, 1:41 pm
Madison, 5 U.S. (1 Cranch) 137, 177 (1803), and the Executive’s constitutional duty “to preserve the national security,” United States v. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 3:39 pm by Guest Author
Origin and Meaning of the Anti-Power-Concentration Principle In Seila Law v. [read post]
26 Mar 2020, 12:42 pm by Nicholas Mosvick
Frankfurter decided that it was a political question only to be resolved by the legislative branches of government because Article I, Section IV gave Congress exclusive power to secure fair representation of the states in the House. [read post]
6 Aug 2011, 9:21 am by Ted Frank
United States, 403 U.S. 713, 91 S.Ct. 2140, 29 L.Ed.2d 822 (1971), and the hydrogen bomb plans case, United States v. [read post]
21 May 2008, 1:43 pm
Foster, 109 Ohio St.3d 1, 2006-Ohio-856, 845 N.E.2d 470, this court's response to the United States Supreme Court decision in Blakely v. [read post]
12 Jun 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
This controversial tool, which the Constitution says absolutely nothing about, is an example of an institutional rule that, for better or worse, has impacted constitutional development within the United States. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 8:47 am by Eugene Volokh
United States (1893), held broadly, as the Government describes it, that the power to exclude aliens is "inherent in sovereignty, necessary for maintaining normal international relations and defending the country against foreign encroachments and dangers—a power to be exercised exclusively by the political branches of government .... [read post]
29 Oct 2021, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
Wasserman The Supreme Court hears arguments Monday in United States v. [read post]
16 Nov 2007, 10:35 am
This morning the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals released an opinion in Al-Haramain Islamic v. [read post]
29 Jan 2022, 7:06 am by SHG
Equality of rights under the law shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any state on account of sex. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 12:11 pm by Rory Little
United States – which was a product of the residual clause itself — has generated. [read post]
16 May 2018, 5:47 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Under RFRA, a plaintiff can assert a violation of the statute "as a claim or defense in a judicial proceeding and obtain relief against a government," defined as "a branch, department, agency, instrumentality, and official . . . of the United States. [read post]
16 Sep 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
 The UK Supreme Court decided, in the 2018 Miller v. [read post]