Search for: "Brown v. State Bar" Results 921 - 940 of 1,983
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jul 2012, 8:00 am
  Browning v Reane, decided in 1812, suggests that where an individual is “incapable, from mental imbecility, to take care of his or her own person and property, such a person cannot dispose of his or her person and property by the matrimonial contract, any more than by any other contract” (Browning v Reane (1812) 161 E.R. 1080 (Eng. [read post]
14 Dec 2016, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Sept. 9, Dowling, J.).Whether other trial court judges from around the commonwealth will rule in a similar fashion or will, instead, apply the same rule of discovery pertaining to video surveillance remains to be seen.Claims of Privileged Information in DiscoveryIn its decision in the case Brown v. [read post]
22 Jun 2019, 6:54 pm by Eugene Volokh
" ACLU of RI cooperating attorney Labinger stated: "The internet can be full of intemperate and uncomfortable discussions. [read post]
19 Oct 2021, 7:44 am by Russell Knight
If someone says something as to their state of mind such as “I’m scared” or “I’m angry” that statement can be seen as reliable and is, thus, an exception to the bar against hearsay. [read post]
28 Aug 2018, 8:13 am by Carolyn Shapiro
The year before Harlan’s nomination the Supreme Court decided Brown v. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
But in 1896, when Louisiana required separate (and obviously unequal) seating compartments for Blacks and Whites on railroads, the Supreme Court said yes,ushering in generations of segregation in public schools and government and private facilities.Even when the Court finally ordered public schools desegregated in 1954 in Brown v. [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 3:51 pm
 The petition — in Brown, et al., v. [read post]
23 Aug 2013, 6:41 am by Clark
I don't think American atheists are living in the wrong country, and I find ample support for that belief in the Constitution, which bars religious tests for office, as well as state establishment of religion. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 11:30 am by Mark Graber
  Gerald Rosenberg bases his controversial claim that lawyers cannot bring about substantial social change on the impact of Brown v. [read post]