Search for: "California Natural Products" Results 921 - 940 of 4,990
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Apr 2024, 5:30 am by Gonzalo E. Mon
The court also noted that the challenged claims appeared “immediately adjacent to the Nutrition Facts panel showing the amount of both naturally occurring and added sugar,” and, thus, that no reasonable consumer “would assume that the Product is generally healthy or would not increase the risk of any disease. [read post]
10 Apr 2011, 5:05 pm
California - What is the tie that binds the following eleven threads? [read post]
10 Apr 2011, 8:02 pm
California - What is the tie that binds the following eleven threads? [read post]
23 May 2017, 5:13 pm by Steven Boutwell
” BSEE is headquartered in Washington D.C. and supported by regional offices in New Orleans, Louisiana, Camarillo, California, and Anchorage, Alaska. [read post]
20 May 2015, 4:30 am
 Coco Chanel said that nature gives you your face at 20, but you earn your face at 50. [read post]
1 Mar 2018, 9:00 am by Michael H Cohen
Next knock: FDA issues a warning letter to the pharmaceutical manufacturing facility for some of the products sold by the Natural Health Center. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 10:03 pm by Cathy Siegner
Consumer Reports suggested that FDA establish a maximum acceptable level of 4-MEI as an additive in foods and beverages, require labeling when it is present, and bar any products from being labeled as “natural” if caramel coloring is included. [read post]
2 Apr 2008, 3:55 am
Apr. 3, 2008), the California Supreme Court unanimously held that a manufacturer is not liable to a sophisticated user of its product for failing to warn of dangers about which the sophisticated user knew or should have known. [read post]
14 Jul 2022, 4:42 pm by lcampbell@lawbc.com
Critics view EPA’s policy about treated articles as not incorporating a sufficiently robust assessment of the impacts of this pesticide use pattern -- that is, the dust from the treated seeds and the systemic nature of neonicotinoid products used this way have impacts that EPA “ignores” due to the treated article exemption. [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 3:04 pm by Richard Reibstein Esq.
  The state law, California Assembly Bill 2257 (AB2257) which Governor Newsom signed into law on September 4, 2020,  replaced Assembly Bill 5 (AB5), which had codified California’s version of the so-called ABC test. [read post]
10 Oct 2013, 4:33 am by Bill Marler
” “Salmonella is naturally occurring in poultry and can be fully eradicated if raw product is properly handled and fully cooked,” said Dr. [read post]
6 Dec 2017, 4:21 pm by INFORRM
Google has successfully convinced a judge in the tech industry-friendly US District Court of Northern California (covering Silicon Valley naturally) to issue a temporary injunction nullifying the enforceability in the United States of an order from a Canadian provincial court in British Columbia (BC), upheld on appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada (SCC), to delist from its global search results all references to Datalink Technologies Gateways and its counterfeit product,… [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 3:04 pm by Bill Marler
The following products are subject to recall: 2-oz. packages containing Citterio “Premium Italian-Style Salame Sticks ALL NATURAL” with “best by” dates through January 23, 2022, located next to the barcode. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 4:50 am by Dianne Saxe
Fish oil supplements bearing a Natural Product Number (NPN) on the label, should have met Health Canada’s regulatory requirements. [read post]
30 Jan 2021, 8:24 am by Eugene Volokh
" … California law directs the Department to review food labelling for compliance with federal law. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 9:07 am by John P. Feldman and Courtney E. Fisher
’” In response to R and A Synergy’s suit for false advertising under the Lanham Act, the court found the statements concerning the innovative nature of the product to be non-actionable puffery. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 9:07 am by John P. Feldman and Courtney E. Fisher
’” In response to R and A Synergy’s suit for false advertising under the Lanham Act, the court found the statements concerning the innovative nature of the product to be non-actionable puffery. [read post]