Search for: "California v. Marks" Results 921 - 940 of 4,400
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Apr 2013, 11:45 am by Conor McEvily
Perry (challenging California’s Proposition 8) and United States v. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 5:35 am by Rebecca Tushnet
(title reference) Hebrew University of Jerusalem v. [read post]
24 May 2016, 4:31 pm by Mark Patrick
  The case marks only the second time the Federal Circuit has found software-related claims eligible for patent protection since the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Alice Corp. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 6:13 am by Howard Friedman
The court also dismissed an added complaints that scanning his identification card in order to get his meal amounted to imposing "the Mark of the Beast," and that eggs and milk were expensive at the prison commissary.In Sims v. [read post]
5 Sep 2017, 4:34 am by Edith Roberts
California; and a double-jeopardy case, Currier v. [read post]
3 Jul 2017, 11:27 am
 | US Supreme Court uses TC Heartland to blunt key troll tool, but will California welcome the next wave of troll litigation? [read post]
3 Jul 2017, 11:27 am
 | US Supreme Court uses TC Heartland to blunt key troll tool, but will California welcome the next wave of troll litigation? [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 1:30 am by Neil Wilkof
This was the issue considered by the Singapore District Court in Public Prosecutor v Qiao Mu [2020] SGDC 59. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 12:25 pm by Eric Goldman
Ingrass isn’t a registered mark, but the court concludes that it’s suggestive. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 1:53 pm by Hiro Aragaki
  The lower federal courts refused to enforce this class arbitration “waiver” under the California Supreme Court’s decision in Discover Bank v. [read post]
1 Jan 2018, 12:30 am
Bigger judgment, smaller royalty rate -the US courts make their mark onthe FRAND setting arms-raceHaving digested the Unwired Planet judgment one too many times, the AmeriKat was relieved that longtime Kat friend Richard Vary (Bird & Bird) volunteered to devour the epic FRAND judgment from California that was recently delivered in the TCL v Ericsson battle. [read post]