Search for: "Clark v. Clark" Results 921 - 940 of 5,741
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Oct 2008, 11:50 am
Here's the abstract:The Supreme Court's decision in Medellin v. [read post]
8 May 2012, 3:58 am by Laura Sandwell, Matrix.
Starting on Tuesday 8 May 2012 in front of Lords Hope, Walker, Kerr, Clarke and Dyson is the hearing of Phillips v Mulcaire. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 10:57 am by nflatow
On November 9 the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in National Meat Association v. [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 9:07 am by CMS
In this case preview, Kenny Henderson and Joanna Clark, who both work within the CMS Dispute Resolution team, consider the appeal which starts tomorrow in the matter of WM Morrisons Supermarket plc v Various Claimants: On 6 and 7 November 2019, the Supreme Court will hear Morrison’s appeal from the ruling of the Court of Appeal, in a data breach claim brought by 5,500 employees. [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 11:40 am by Rich McHugh
By Rich McHugh The United State Supreme Court issued an opinion on June 12, 2014 in Clark v. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 9:14 am by Sara Skiff
Coming today to Answers to Questions: Jim Perrier compares Interwoven Worksite (now Autonomy) and eDOCS, Blair Clark discusses the costs of switching from WordPerfect to Word, William Lloyd explains why he uses three monitors, James Degnan reviews Pensoft Payroll, and Mazyar Hedayat reviews ProLaw for small firms. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 2:58 pm by Howard M. Wasserman
ShareMythological creatures and French literary heroes appeared during argument in Thompson v. [read post]
17 Oct 2007, 12:34 pm
Crisis Jurisprudence, the Guantánamo Detainees, and the Imperiled Role of Habeas Corpus in Curbing Abusive Government Detention, 11 Lewis & Clark Law Review 539 (2007) In June of 2007, the Supreme Court abruptly reversed its earlier decision and granted certiorari in the Guantánamo Bay detainee case, Boumediene v. [read post]
9 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
”Justice Sotomayor worries that the Clark decision sends a bad signal: “This Court does not always mean what it says. [read post]
20 Sep 2009, 9:22 am
A recent case in point is the British Columbia Court of Appeal decision in Doucette v. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 8:34 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Holtom, R. v [2010] EWCA Crim 934 (20 April 2010) Valentas & Anor, R. v [2010] EWCA Crim 200 (03 February 2010) Clarke, R. v [2010] EWCA Crim 684 (11 February 2010) R, R. v [2010] EWCA Crim 194 (02 February 2010) R, R. v [2010] EWCA Crim 907 (14 April 2010) Attorney Generals Reference No. 112 of 2009 (Church) [2010] EWCA Crim 351 (10 February 2010) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Secretary of State… [read post]