Search for: "Doe v. Choices, Inc." Results 921 - 940 of 3,248
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Dec 2011, 3:07 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
However, a client's "dissatisfaction with reasonable strategic choices regarding litigation" does not "as a matter of law, constitute cause for the discharge of an attorney" (Callaghan v Callaghan, 48 AD3d at 501; see Magnacoustics, Inc. v Ostrolenk, Faber, Gerb & Soffen, 303 AD2d 561, 562). [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 7:45 am by Hayleigh Bosher
In the US “nonexclusive licenses may be granted orally or may even be implied from conduct” [Graham v James (1998) 144 F 3d 229, 235 (2d Cir)]; where an implied licence arises out of “objective conduct that would permit a reasonable person to conclude that an agreement had been reached” [Joe Hand Promotions, Inc v Maupin, No 15, Civ 6355, 2018 WL 2417840, 5]. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 4:51 am by John Jascob
UBS Financial Services, Inc. (19-249): Whether the grant of an employee stock option is a “sale” of a security under the Securities Act of 1933.Isaacson/Weaver Family Trust v. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 11:27 am by Eric Goldman
” Instead, the court looks to see if Twitter properly alleged special damages, such as consequential damages (Hadley v. [read post]
31 May 2007, 5:15 am
" It first agreed with the Examining Attorney that Banana's design is not inherently distinctive under the test [for product packaging] set forth in Seabrook Foods, Inc. v. [read post]
10 May 2011, 9:46 am by Josh Wright
“Mere size does not demonstrate competitive harm. [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 5:12 pm by pgbarnes
The appeal came in the case of Derek Carder, et al v. [read post]