Search for: "Does 1-44" Results 921 - 940 of 4,339
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Aug 2021, 6:54 pm
The choice I had to make, as your President, was either to follow through on that agreement or be prepared to go back to fighting the Taliban in the middle of the spring fighting season.Joe Biden: (04:44)There would have been no ceasefire after May 1. [read post]
13 Aug 2021, 10:59 am by Katie Culliton
Not only does that help keep California employers in compliance, but it also helps workers feel more refreshed and, potentially, more productive during the work day. [read post]
10 Aug 2021, 10:47 am by Jonathan Holbrook
North Carolina does have statutes that address vaccination records (Chapter 130A, Article 6) and counterfeit trademarks (Chapter 80, Article 1), but I have been unable to find any direct criminal law parallels to the federal or California statutes cited above. [read post]
10 Aug 2021, 8:48 am by fjhinojosa
Platt, Is Administrative Summary Judgment Unlawful, 44 Harv. [read post]
9 Aug 2021, 6:16 pm by Sophia Tang
The application of lex loci delicti, as a general rule, is stipulated in Article 44 Chinese Conflicts Act and Article 4(1) Rome II Regulation. [read post]
8 Aug 2021, 6:34 pm by Jackie O'Brien (AU)
      [1] Thaler v Commissioner of Patents [2021] FCA 879 (Thaler). [2] Both the European Patents Office and the UK High Court have recently rejected patent applications naming DABUS as the inventor. [read post]
8 Aug 2021, 6:34 pm by Jackie O'Brien (AU)
      [1] Thaler v Commissioner of Patents [2021] FCA 879 (Thaler). [2] Both the European Patents Office and the UK High Court have recently rejected patent applications naming DABUS as the inventor. [read post]
5 Aug 2021, 5:41 am by Editor Charlie
  We also appreciate that the Judges seek to do justice and find a fair result given their appointed role of administering the awesome power of the government to compel songwriters to accept all rates and terms of the statutory license. 1. [read post]
5 Aug 2021, 2:57 am by Apostolos Anthimos
The violation of the procedural ordre public as ground for non recognition and enforcement of such decisions, under the Articles 34 (1) and 45 (1) of the EU Regulation 44/2001 (Brussels I Regulation). [read post]
2 Aug 2021, 6:02 am by Rob Robinson
While ComplexDiscovery regularly highlights this information, it does not assume any responsibility for content assertions. [read post]
1 Aug 2021, 2:13 am by Neil Wilkof
The author of these lines does not think this to be the case and he very much looks forward to the AG opinion and the CJEU decision. [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 4:37 am
Of course, most of the decisions are not precedential, but even non-precedential decisions may be helpful in framing effective arguments and locating precedential support for them.There are four elements that must be met to invoke the bar of Section 2(e)(3): (1) The primary significance of the mark is a generally known geographic place; (2) The goods or services do not originate in the place identified in the mark; (3) Purchasers would be likely to believe that the goods or services… [read post]