Search for: "Does v. United States of America" Results 921 - 940 of 4,679
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Mar 2021, 7:01 am by Joel R. Brandes
It agreed with the District Court’s conclusion that Appellant met her burden of showing L.S. was well-settled in the United States. [read post]
6 Mar 2021, 10:41 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Cir. 2006) (rejecting a construction of a term that would render another limitation superfluous).6 Chef America is cited in footnote 6 Our opinion in Chef America, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Mar 2021, 9:13 am by Sarah Libowsky, Krista Oehlke
The United States Refugee Admissions Program (USRAP) is but one example. [read post]
§ 1447(d) generally provides that “an order remanding a case to the State court from which it was removed is not reviewable on appeal,” the United States Supreme Court explained in Thermtron Prods., Inc. v. [read post]
§ 1447(d) generally provides that “an order remanding a case to the State court from which it was removed is not reviewable on appeal,” the United States Supreme Court explained in Thermtron Prods., Inc. v. [read post]
23 Feb 2021, 2:18 pm by Eugene Volokh
That day, defendant Pete Buttigieg made the following tweet: Buttigieg is an American politician and was a 2020 candidate for the Democratic Party nomination for President of the United States of America. [read post]
” Perhaps viral video recordings of Black Americans being beaten, tortured, and executed only reinforce white supremacy in the United States? [read post]
15 Feb 2021, 3:58 am by Fred Rocafort
For instance, tariffs on components for products made in the United States may be eliminated, as well as products made by the China operations of US companies. [read post]
6 Feb 2021, 4:30 am by Guest Blogger
For the Symposium on Mary Ziegler, Abortion and the Law in America: Roe v. [read post]
4 Feb 2021, 4:21 pm by Elyssa Sternberg
United States of America, No. 19-35389 (9th Cir. 2020), the Ninth Circuit held that a willful violation is one in which an employer “knows or shows reckless disregard for” whether its conduct was prohibited by the statute, as defined in the FLSA. [read post]