Search for: "Group Health Inc. v. United States" Results 921 - 940 of 1,210
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jan 2020, 4:32 pm by INFORRM
United States New York state’s highest court will consider whether U.S. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 6:00 pm
Signature Financial Group, Inc., and AT&T Corp. v. [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 7:16 pm by admin
“The United States brought this case to protect an important body of water, Pyramid Lake,” said Ignacia S. [read post]
8 May 2011, 11:58 am by Law Lady
 Health Care Reform: 11TH CIRCUIT SETS JUNE HEARING IN CASE ON HEALTH CARE REFORM LAW, Florida v. [read post]
13 Jan 2022, 6:00 am by Ana Popovich
To assess medical care, [investigators] utilized medical experts from the National Commission on Correctional Health Care (NCCHC) Resources, Inc. 12 to conduct a virtual tour of the ICDC medical unit and medical records review. [read post]
23 Dec 2007, 8:00 pm
: (IPEG),More on the implementation of the London Agreement and patent cost reduction in Europe: (Patent Baristas),ECJ rules that EU legislative obligations cannot be enforced in any Member State if that legislation has not been published in the Official Journal in the language of that Member State (Case C-161/06  OlomoucSkoma-Lux sro v Celni reditelstvi Olumouc): (IPKat),EPO fighting complex appl [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 1:41 am
Morgan Contract Furniture resolves design right infringement claim against PTT Design (Class 99) United States US General Disney: Is it about contents, distribution, or branding? [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 1:41 am
Morgan Contract Furniture resolves design right infringement claim against PTT Design (Class 99) United States US General Disney: Is it about contents, distribution, or branding? [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 1:41 am
Morgan Contract Furniture resolves design right infringement claim against PTT Design (Class 99)   United States US General Disney: Is it about contents, distribution, or branding? [read post]
  The Executive Order endorsed this approach, noting that “this order reaffirms that the United States retains the authority to challenge transactions whose previous consummation was in violation of the [antitrust laws]. [read post]
16 Sep 2016, 2:02 pm by Schachtman
We are getting close to a quarter of a century since the United States Supreme Court outlined the requirements of gatekeeping, in Daubert v. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 1:35 pm by Tom Lamb
Wolfe, a senior adviser to the Health Research Group at Public Citizen, which in 2011 petitioned the F.D.A. to pass just such a rule. [read post]