Search for: "H. T. v A. E." Results 921 - 940 of 3,025
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jun 2014, 7:53 am by Administrator
H.19, as amended (the “Code”). [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 2:02 pm
Até o momento, há três votos pela constitucionalidade da norma - da ministra Rosa Weber e dos ministros Luiz Fux e Joaquim Barbosa – e um voto pela inconstitucionalidade de vários dispositivos da lei – do ministro Dias Toffoli. [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 7:05 am
’ To the contrary, the conditions of release say:`[H]e will be subject to random inspections of his computer's internet and email usage history by the Pre–Trial Services Officer assigned to his case, in order to ensure compliance with the parameters of these conditions. [read post]
1 Jul 2024, 5:11 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
It may now be possible to attack unfavorable interpretations such as the BIA’s restrictive definition of “particular social group” under Matter of M-E-V-G , or the BIA’s narrow interpretation of INA §203(h)(3) under Matter of Wang , which precludes many derivative beneficiaries of visa petitions who did not get protection under the Child Status Protection Act (CSPA) from retaining their parents’ priority dates. [read post]
7 Sep 2014, 4:00 am by Administrator
Un premier test, subi à 2 h 20, n’a pas été concluant, mais le second, subi 2 minutes plus tard, s’est révélé un échec. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 11:53 am by Orin Kerr
” Finally, when Prokupek’s counsel again asked him if he stopped Prokupek because “[h]e failed to signal his northbound turn onto the [county] roadway,” Trooper Estwick responded, “Yes. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 2:08 pm
Segundo ele, não há um ato de ofício que mostre a contraprestação do então deputado pelo dinheiro recebido. [read post]
7 May 2020, 3:58 am by Edith Roberts
Supreme Court case involving a statutory immigration provision has the potential for implications far beyond the narrow issue in the case”; she argues that “[t]he Supreme Court’s most recent statutory interpretation case, Barton v. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
A New York State and Local Retirement System member has only 30 days following the “date of payability” of his or her retirement allowance to change his or her retirement optionBatorksy v New York State Off. of the Comptroller, 2016 NY Slip Op 02698, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentVictor H. [read post]
5 Jul 2015, 3:49 pm
I had heard that changes were coming, but I didn’t know what they were until very recently. [read post]