Search for: "Head v State"
Results 921 - 940
of 14,945
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Sep 2013, 11:59 am
” See, United States v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 10:37 pm
[Graham v. [read post]
18 Aug 2017, 2:21 pm
Wampanoag Tribe of Gay Head and Massachusetts v. [read post]
18 Aug 2017, 2:21 pm
Wampanoag Tribe of Gay Head and Massachusetts v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 10:07 am
The Court’s ruling in United States v. [read post]
25 Sep 2022, 5:51 pm
“The headline of this piece is likely to turn a few heads. [read post]
21 Oct 2009, 4:00 am
In the recent case of Burdette v. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 1:57 am
Cases C-146/13 and C-147/13 Kingdom of Spain v European Parliament and Council of the European Union have now both reached the point at which Advocate General Bot has published his Opinion, which means that all that is left now is for the CJEU to determine whether it will follow his guidance (as happens around 80 per cent of the time) or articulate its own reasoning. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 9:00 am
Halliburton Co. will head back to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, with perhaps another trip to the Supreme Court to follow. [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 2:24 pm
Head's up on an interesting case from the Court of Federal Claims, Resource Investments, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Mar 2015, 11:31 am
Further, the Explanatory Notes to 9018 state that the heading excludes certain items of dental equipment when separately presented. [read post]
12 Aug 2020, 5:01 am
On July 20, the Ninth Circuit declined to rehear en banc Fazaga v. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 12:55 pm
Cress v. [read post]
7 Jul 2015, 10:00 am
DOITT v. [read post]
6 May 2014, 1:00 pm
In Salazar v. [read post]
17 May 2024, 12:29 pm
I am doubtful that Justice Barrett would have joined United States v. [read post]
23 Feb 2008, 8:09 am
Below are some samples of their work: STOPPING THE OBSCENITY MADNESS 50 YEARS AFTER ROTH V. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 3:37 pm
ARTICLE V (1) Neither of the Contracting Parties shall be bound to deliver up its own nationals under this Treaty but the executive authority of each Contracting Party shall have the power to deliver them up if, in its discretion, it considers that it is proper to do so. (2) For the purposes of this Article - (a) a reference to the executive authority of a Contracting Party shall, in the case of Australia, be construed as a reference to the Attorney-General of Australia; (b) Australian… [read post]
4 Mar 2022, 1:27 pm
On Thursday, in United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 7:29 pm
See Columbia v. [read post]
