Search for: "In Re Stanford"
Results 921 - 940
of 2,759
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Feb 2011, 6:54 am
They tell us we're next, so we're figuring we're next. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 10:41 am
The coveted 2d and 3d places switch hands with Stanford popping up over Harvard. [read post]
23 May 2017, 11:11 pm
These are the problems I’ll be tackling next, but they’re going to take an army of scholars – especially those willing to engage both communities of law and communication. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 8:57 am
In the past week I've talked with a number of people that have come out of Stanford University's CodeX, the short name for The Stanford Center for Legal Informatics program. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 8:42 am
If you’re a Rolling Stones fan, you may remember the (underrated) 1974 song, “Fingerprint File. [read post]
27 Jan 2018, 2:36 am
We’re woke. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 1:44 pm
She founded Theranos in 2003 after dropping out of Stanford University to start a company that could perform many blood tests from one drop of blood. [read post]
19 Dec 2009, 4:03 pm
In In re Bose, the Federal Circuit raised the bar for proving fraud on the PTO. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 12:00 am
We’re surrounded by both good luck and bad luck: accidents happen. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 6:47 am
Senior IP Scholar Session Paul Goldstein, Stanford Law School A lot of the industry-specific provisions of copyright have no present justification and should be tossed (e.g., cable licensing); mature industry likes settled rules, but that’s not good enough. [read post]
31 Dec 2016, 10:49 am
We’re delighted to extend the deadline for such proposals till Monday, January 9 – and to report that several dozen proposals already have been submitted (and many already accepted, on a rolling basis). [read post]
14 Aug 2009, 12:25 pm
The Case: - Their backgrounds aren't all-Ivy, but the undergrad schools are certainly Ivy-equivalent: Stanford for the bride, Chicago for the groom. [read post]
6 Nov 2006, 7:09 pm
(This guest posting comes via Lauren Gelman, deputy director of the Center for Internet & Society at Stanford Law School.) [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 3:15 am
That was another big point of contention in the Stanford study. [read post]
11 Mar 2007, 3:15 pm
They're pure evil. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 12:14 am
Following a Stanford-sponsored presentation she attended in Malaysia in early 2005, Ibrahim was prevented from re-entering the U.S. after being informed that her name appeared on the No-Fly List. [read post]
10 Aug 2007, 4:14 pm
These frames aren't supposed to communicate if they're served by different domain names, however. [read post]
26 May 2011, 12:40 pm
’” Id. at *3 (citing In re Automotive Refinishing, 358 F.3d 288, 306 (3rd Cir. 2004)). [read post]
16 Feb 2021, 4:02 am
Or, as the brilliant faculty at Stanford assumes, maybe that means they’re poor. [read post]
6 Apr 2007, 2:29 am
"It seems they're becoming more restrictive in interpreting the rights of the patentee," said Wetherell. [read post]
