Search for: "Mark A. Lemley"
Results 921 - 940
of 1,110
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jul 2011, 7:49 am
* Speaking of which, the EFF and Mark Lemley are fighting back against the DHS ICE domain name seizures. [read post]
10 May 2021, 8:08 am
The motion was filed by Stanford’s IP Clinic (Philip Malone) on behalf of a group of law professors led by Mark Lemley. [read post]
15 May 2011, 4:16 pm
Mark Lemley and David McGowan authored a wonderful piece on network effects and law over 10 years ago and the legal literature continues to blossom (from Aviram to Zaring). [read post]
15 May 2011, 9:17 pm
The year after Carrier published this article, Dan Burk and Mark Lemley published their (even more highly cited) Policy Levers in Patent Law, which argues for a similar industry-specific tailoring of patent laws (and notes that there are many levers within the current Patent Act that can be used for this tailoring). [read post]
22 Nov 2022, 8:43 am
Camilla Hrdy and Mark Lemley’s paper titled “Abandoning Trade Secrets” provides much needed context for interpreting the legal “independent economic value” requirement. [read post]
14 Feb 2008, 7:30 am
Deputy Attorney General-Jennifer Granick / Civil Liberties Director, Electronic Frontier Foundation-Joi Ito / Chair, Creative Commons; Founder & CEO, Neoteny-Michael Jacobson / General Counsel, eBay-Jeff Jonas / Distinguished Engineer and Chief Scientist, IBM Entity Analytics-Andrew Keen / Author, Cult of the Amateur-Daphne Keller / Senior Product Counsel, Google-Chris Kelly / Chief Privacy Officer, Facebook-Orin Kerr / Professor of Law, George Washington University Law School-Alex Kozinski… [read post]
20 Jul 2021, 5:00 am
Mark A. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 8:14 am
This brief substantially follows Mark Lemley’s article on the topic. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 5:29 am
"It sounds like Menell thinks the Federal Circuit got it right with the machine-or-transformation test, and since he was on the same panel at the Stanford symposium with Mark Lemley, whose paper argued against gatekeeping approaches like machine-or-transformation, it would have been interesting to hear their conversation about this. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 5:31 am
In carving out this limitation, Kagan cited Mark Lemley’s influential article, “Rethinking Assignor Estoppel. [read post]
3 Jan 2023, 5:57 am
Our peer-reviewed Journal of Free Speech Law, which is now two years old, has published dozens of articles, including by Jack Balkin (Yale), Mark Lemley (Stanford), Jeremy Waldron (NYU), Cynthia Estlund (NYU, forthcoming within a week or so), Christopher Yoo (Penn), Danielle Citron (Virginia), and many others—both prominent figures in the field and emerging young scholars (including ones who didn't have a tenure-track academic appointment). [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 7:19 am
Burk & Mark A. [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 6:33 pm
The essays’ authors includes legal luminaries like Yochai Benkler, Robert Cooter, Ronald Gilson, Mark Lemley, Peter Schuck, and others. [read post]
16 Feb 2009, 1:40 am
**Mark Lemley wrote in 58 Stanford LR 601:Chester Carlson, a patent attorney, invented xerography in 1938. [read post]
3 May 2010, 9:59 am
Many scholars have written in this space – Jack Balkin, Larry Lessig, Yochai Benkler, Barbara van Schewick, Tim Wu, Mark Lemley, Susan Crawford, and Brett Frischmann, to name a few. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 2:17 pm
It has published dozens of articles, including by Jack Balkin (Yale), Mark Lemley (Stanford), Jeremy Waldron (NYU), Cynthia Estlund (NYU, forthcoming within a week or so), Christopher Yoo (Penn), Danielle Citron (Virginia), and many others—both prominent figures in the field and emerging young scholars (including ones who didn't have a tenure-track academic appointment). [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 8:01 am
Amicus Curiae Professors represented by Jacob Sherkow, University of Illinois and Mark Lemley, Stanford University Amicus Curiae American Intellectual Property Law Association represented by Barbara A. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 11:09 am
The conference ended with Stanford’s Mark Lemley, who explained how courts should approach the issue of ongoing royalties in cases where injunctions are not granted and the losing defendant continues to infringe. [read post]
21 Oct 2007, 10:00 pm
The primary lenses used by these scholars were either law (I benefited greatly from Mark Lemley, Rob Merges, Pamela Samuelson) or economics (Bronwyn Hall, David Mowery, Suzanne Scotchmer, Carl Shapiro, Hal Varian, Brian Wright) ... [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 2:04 pm
This approach is supported by an interesting article by Mark Lemley, et al., that argues most divided infringement situations could be solved by better claim drafting. [read post]
